org.scalatest.featurespec
Classes and traits for ScalaTest's FeatureSpec style.
This package is released as the scalatest-featurespec module.
Type members
Classlikes
A suite of tests in which each test represents one scenario of a feature.
AnyFeatureSpec is intended for writing tests that are "higher level" than unit tests, for example, integration
tests, functional tests, and acceptance tests. You can use AnyFeatureSpec for unit testing if you prefer, however.
A suite of tests in which each test represents one scenario of a feature.
AnyFeatureSpec is intended for writing tests that are "higher level" than unit tests, for example, integration
tests, functional tests, and acceptance tests. You can use AnyFeatureSpec for unit testing if you prefer, however.
Recommended Usage:
Class AnyFeatureSpec is primarily intended for acceptance testing, including facilitating the process of programmers working alongside non-programmers to
define the acceptance requirements.
|
Although not required, AnyFeatureSpec is often used together with GivenWhenThen to express acceptance requirements
in more detail. Here's an example:
package org.scalatest.examples.featurespec
import org.scalatest._
class TVSet {
private var on: Boolean = false
def isOn: Boolean = on
def pressPowerButton() {
on = !on
}
}
class TVSetSpec extends featurespec.AnyFeatureSpec with GivenWhenThen {
info("As a TV set owner")
info("I want to be able to turn the TV on and off")
info("So I can watch TV when I want")
info("And save energy when I'm not watching TV")
Feature("TV power button") {
Scenario("User presses power button when TV is off") {
Given("a TV set that is switched off")
val tv = new TVSet
assert(!tv.isOn)
When("the power button is pressed")
tv.pressPowerButton()
Then("the TV should switch on")
assert(tv.isOn)
}
Scenario("User presses power button when TV is on") {
Given("a TV set that is switched on")
val tv = new TVSet
tv.pressPowerButton()
assert(tv.isOn)
When("the power button is pressed")
tv.pressPowerButton()
Then("the TV should switch off")
assert(!tv.isOn)
}
}
}
Note: for more information on the calls to Given, When, and Then, see the documentation
for trait GivenWhenThen and the Informers section below.
A AnyFeatureSpec contains feature clauses and scenarios. You define a feature clause
with feature, and a scenario with scenario. Both
feature and scenario are methods, defined in
AnyFeatureSpec, which will be invoked
by the primary constructor of TVSetSpec.
A feature clause describes a feature of the subject (class or other entity) you are specifying
and testing. In the previous example,
the subject under specification and test is a TV set. The feature being specified and tested is
the behavior of a TV set when its power button is pressed. With each scenario you provide a
string (the spec text) that specifies the behavior of the subject for
one scenario in which the feature may be used, and a block of code that tests that behavior.
You place the spec text between the parentheses, followed by the test code between curly
braces. The test code will be wrapped up as a function passed as a by-name parameter to
scenario, which will register the test for later execution.
A AnyFeatureSpec's lifecycle has two phases: the registration phase and the
ready phase. It starts in registration phase and enters ready phase the first time
run is called on it. It then remains in ready phase for the remainder of its lifetime.
Scenarios can only be registered with the scenario method while the AnyFeatureSpec is
in its registration phase. Any attempt to register a scenario after the AnyFeatureSpec has
entered its ready phase, i.e., after run has been invoked on the AnyFeatureSpec,
will be met with a thrown TestRegistrationClosedException. The recommended style
of using AnyFeatureSpec is to register tests during object construction as is done in all
the examples shown here. If you keep to the recommended style, you should never see a
TestRegistrationClosedException.
Each scenario represents one test. The name of the test is the spec text passed to the scenario method.
The feature name does not appear as part of the test name. In a AnyFeatureSpec, therefore, you must take care
to ensure that each test has a unique name (in other words, that each scenario has unique spec text).
When you run a AnyFeatureSpec, it will send Formatters in the events it sends to the
Reporter. ScalaTest's built-in reporters will report these events in such a way
that the output is easy to read as an informal specification of the subject being tested.
For example, were you to run TVSetSpec from within the Scala interpreter:
scala> org.scalatest.run(new TVSetSpec)
You would see:
TVSetSpec:
As a TV set owner
I want to be able to turn the TV on and off
So I can watch TV when I want
And save energy when I'm not watching TV
Feature: TV power button
Scenario: User presses power button when TV is off
Given a TV set that is switched off
When the power button is pressed
Then the TV should switch on
Scenario: User presses power button when TV is on
Given a TV set that is switched on
When the power button is pressed
Then the TV should switch off
Or, to run just the “Feature: TV power button Scenario: User presses power button when TV is on” method, you could pass that test's name, or any unique substring of the
name, such as "TV is on". Here's an example:
scala> org.scalatest.run(new TVSetSpec, "TV is on")
TVSetSpec:
As a TV set owner
I want to be able to turn the TV on and off
So I can watch TV when I want
And save energy when I'm not watching TV
Feature: TV power button
Scenario: User presses power button when TV is on
Given a TV set that is switched on
When the power button is pressed
Then the TV should switch off
Note: Trait AnyFeatureSpec's syntax is in part inspired by Cucumber, a Ruby BDD framework.
To support the common use case of temporarily disabling a test, with the
good intention of resurrecting the test at a later time, AnyFeatureSpec provides registration
methods that start with ignore instead of scenario. For example, to temporarily
disable the test named addition, just change “scenario” into “ignore,” like this:
package org.scalatest.examples.featurespec.ignore
import org.scalatest.featurespec.AnyFeatureSpec
class TVSet {
private var on: Boolean = false
def isOn: Boolean = on
def pressPowerButton() {
on = !on
}
}
class TVSetSpec extends AnyFeatureSpec {
Feature("TV power button") {
ignore("User presses power button when TV is off") {
val tv = new TVSet
assert(!tv.isOn)
tv.pressPowerButton()
assert(tv.isOn)
}
Scenario("User presses power button when TV is on") {
val tv = new TVSet
tv.pressPowerButton()
assert(tv.isOn)
tv.pressPowerButton()
assert(!tv.isOn)
}
}
}
If you run this version of SetSpec with:
scala> org.scalatest.run(new TVSetSpec)
It will run only the second scenario and report that the first scenario was ignored:
TVSetSpec: Feature: TV power button Scenario: User presses power button when TV is off !!! IGNORED !!! Scenario: User presses power button when TV is on
One of the parameters to AnyFeatureSpec's run method is a Reporter, which
will collect and report information about the running suite of tests.
Information about suites and tests that were run, whether tests succeeded or failed,
and tests that were ignored will be passed to the Reporter as the suite runs.
Most often the default reporting done by AnyFeatureSpec's methods will be sufficient, but
occasionally you may wish to provide custom information to the Reporter from a test.
For this purpose, an Informer that will forward information to the current Reporter
is provided via the info parameterless method.
You can pass the extra information to the Informer via its apply method.
The Informer will then pass the information to the Reporter via an InfoProvided event.
One use case for the Informer is to pass more information about a scenario to the reporter. For example,
the GivenWhenThen trait provides methods that use the implicit info provided by AnyFeatureSpec
to pass such information to the reporter. You can see this in action in the initial example of this trait's documentation.
AnyFeatureSpec also provides a markup method that returns a Documenter, which allows you to send
to the Reporter text formatted in Markdown syntax.
You can pass the extra information to the Documenter via its apply method.
The Documenter will then pass the information to the Reporter via an MarkupProvided event.
Here's an example FlatSpec that uses markup:
package org.scalatest.examples.featurespec.markup
import collection.mutable
import org.scalatest._
class SetSpec extends featurespec.AnyFeatureSpec with GivenWhenThen {
markup { """
Mutable Set
-----------
A set is a collection that contains no duplicate elements.
To implement a concrete mutable set, you need to provide implementations
of the following methods:
def contains(elem: A): Boolean
def iterator: Iterator[A]
def += (elem: A): this.type
def -= (elem: A): this.type
If you wish that methods like `take`,
`drop`, `filter` return the same kind of set,
you should also override:
def empty: This
It is also good idea to override methods `foreach` and
`size` for efficiency.
""" }
Feature("An element can be added to an empty mutable Set") {
Scenario("When an element is added to an empty mutable Set") {
Given("an empty mutable Set")
val set = mutable.Set.empty[String]
When("an element is added")
set += "clarity"
Then("the Set should have size 1")
assert(set.size === 1)
And("the Set should contain the added element")
assert(set.contains("clarity"))
markup("This test finished with a **bold** statement!")
}
}
}
Although all of ScalaTest's built-in reporters will display the markup text in some form,
the HTML reporter will format the markup information into HTML. Thus, the main purpose of markup is to
add nicely formatted text to HTML reports. Here's what the above SetSpec would look like in the HTML reporter:
ScalaTest records text passed to info and markup during tests, and sends the recorded text in the recordedEvents field of
test completion events like TestSucceeded and TestFailed. This allows string reporters (like the standard out reporter) to show
info and markup text after the test name in a color determined by the outcome of the test. For example, if the test fails, string
reporters will show the info and markup text in red. If a test succeeds, string reporters will show the info
and markup text in green. While this approach helps the readability of reports, it means that you can't use info to get status
updates from long running tests.
To get immediate (i.e., non-recorded) notifications from tests, you can use note (a Notifier) and alert
(an Alerter). Here's an example showing the differences:
package org.scalatest.examples.featurespec.note
import collection.mutable
import org.scalatest._
class SetSpec extends featurespec.AnyFeatureSpec {
Feature("An element can be added to an empty mutable Set") {
Scenario("When an element is added to an empty mutable Set") {
info("info is recorded")
markup("markup is *also* recorded")
note("notes are sent immediately")
alert("alerts are also sent immediately")
val set = mutable.Set.empty[String]
set += "clarity"
assert(set.size === 1)
assert(set.contains("clarity"))
}
}
}
Because note and alert information is sent immediately, it will appear before the test name in string reporters, and its color will
be unrelated to the ultimate outcome of the test: note text will always appear in green, alert text will always appear in yellow.
Here's an example:
scala> org.scalatest.run(new SetSpec) SetSpec: Feature: An element can be added to an empty mutable Set + notes are sent immediately + alerts are also sent immediately Scenario: When an element is added to an empty mutable Set info is recorded + markup is *also* recorded
Another example is slowpoke notifications.
If you find a test is taking a long time to complete, but you're not sure which test, you can enable
slowpoke notifications. ScalaTest will use an Alerter to fire an event whenever a test has been running
longer than a specified amount of time.
In summary, use info and markup for text that should form part of the specification output. Use
note and alert to send status notifications. (Because the HTML reporter is intended to produce a
readable, printable specification, info and markup text will appear in the HTML report, but
note and alert text will not.)
A pending test is one that has been given a name but is not yet implemented. The purpose of pending tests is to facilitate a style of testing in which documentation of behavior is sketched out before tests are written to verify that behavior (and often, before the behavior of the system being tested is itself implemented). Such sketches form a kind of specification of what tests and functionality to implement later.
To support this style of testing, a test can be given a name that specifies one
bit of behavior required by the system being tested. The test can also include some code that
sends more information about the behavior to the reporter when the tests run. At the end of the test,
it can call method pending, which will cause it to complete abruptly with TestPendingException.
Because tests in ScalaTest can be designated as pending with TestPendingException, both the test name and any information
sent to the reporter when running the test can appear in the report of a test run. (In other words,
the code of a pending test is executed just like any other test.) However, because the test completes abruptly
with TestPendingException, the test will be reported as pending, to indicate
the actual test, and possibly the functionality, has not yet been implemented.
You can mark tests as pending in a AnyFeatureSpec like this:
package org.scalatest.examples.featurespec.pending
import org.scalatest.featurespec.AnyFeatureSpec
class TVSet {
private var on: Boolean = false
def isOn: Boolean = on
def pressPowerButton() {
on = !on
}
}
class TVSetSpec extends AnyFeatureSpec {
Feature("TV power button") {
Scenario("User presses power button when TV is off") (pending)
Scenario("User presses power button when TV is on") {
val tv = new TVSet
tv.pressPowerButton()
assert(tv.isOn)
tv.pressPowerButton()
assert(!tv.isOn)
}
}
}
(Note: "(pending)" is the body of the test. Thus the test contains just one statement, an invocation
of the pending method, which throws TestPendingException.)
If you run this version of TVSetSpec with:
scala> org.scalatest.run(new TVSetSpec)
It will run both tests, but report that When empty should have size 0 is pending. You'll see:
TVSetSpec: Feature: TV power button Scenario: User presses power button when TV is off (pending) Scenario: User presses power button when TV is on
One difference between an ignored test and a pending one is that an ignored test is intended to be used during a significant refactorings of the code under test, when tests break and you don't want to spend the time to fix all of them immediately. You can mark some of those broken tests as ignored temporarily, so that you can focus the red bar on just failing tests you actually want to fix immediately. Later you can go back and fix the ignored tests. In other words, by ignoring some failing tests temporarily, you can more easily notice failed tests that you actually want to fix. By contrast, a pending test is intended to be used before a test and/or the code under test is written. Pending indicates you've decided to write a test for a bit of behavior, but either you haven't written the test yet, or have only written part of it, or perhaps you've written the test but don't want to implement the behavior it tests until after you've implemented a different bit of behavior you realized you need first. Thus ignored tests are designed to facilitate refactoring of existing code whereas pending tests are designed to facilitate the creation of new code.
One other difference between ignored and pending tests is that ignored tests are implemented as a test tag that is
excluded by default. Thus an ignored test is never executed. By contrast, a pending test is implemented as a
test that throws TestPendingException (which is what calling the pending method does). Thus
the body of pending tests are executed up until they throw TestPendingException. The reason for this difference
is that it enables your unfinished test to send InfoProvided messages to the reporter before it completes
abruptly with TestPendingException, as shown in the previous example on Informers
that used the GivenWhenThen trait. For example, the following snippet in a AnyFeatureSpec:
package org.scalatest.examples.featurespec.infopending
import org.scalatest._
class TVSet {
private var on: Boolean = false
def isOn: Boolean = on
def pressPowerButton() {
on = !on
}
}
class TVSetSpec extends featurespec.AnyFeatureSpec with GivenWhenThen {
info("As a TV set owner")
info("I want to be able to turn the TV on and off")
info("So I can watch TV when I want")
info("And save energy when I'm not watching TV")
Feature("TV power button") {
Scenario("User presses power button when TV is off") {
Given("a TV that is switched off")
When("the power button is pressed")
Then("the TV should switch on")
pending
}
Scenario("User presses power button when TV is on") {
Given("a TV that is switched on")
When("the power button is pressed")
Then("the TV should switch off")
pending
}
}
}
Would yield the following output when run in the interpreter:
scala> org.scalatest.run(new TVSetSpec) TVSetSpec: As a TV set owner I want to be able to turn the TV on and off So I can watch TV when I want And save energy when I'm not watching TV Feature: TV power button Scenario: User presses power button when TV is off (pending) Given a TV that is switched off When the power button is pressed Then the TV should switch on Scenario: User presses power button when TV is on (pending) Given a TV that is switched on When the power button is pressed Then the TV should switch off
A AnyFeatureSpec's tests may be classified into groups by tagging them with string names.
As with any suite, when executing a AnyFeatureSpec, groups of tests can
optionally be included and/or excluded. To tag a AnyFeatureSpec's tests,
you pass objects that extend class org.scalatest.Tag to methods
that register tests. Class Tag takes one parameter, a string name. If you have
created tag annotation interfaces as described in the Tag documentation, then you
will probably want to use tag names on your test functions that match. To do so, simply
pass the fully qualified names of the tag interfaces to the Tag constructor. For example, if you've
defined a tag annotation interface with fully qualified name,
com.mycompany.tags.DbTest, then you could
create a matching tag for AnyFeatureSpecs like this:
package org.scalatest.examples.featurespec.tagging
import org.scalatest.Tag
object DbTest extends Tag("com.mycompany.tags.DbTest")
Given these definitions, you could place AnyFeatureSpec tests into groups with tags like this:
import org.scalatest.featurespec.AnyFeatureSpec
import org.scalatest.tagobjects.Slow
class TVSet {
private var on: Boolean = false
def isOn: Boolean = on
def pressPowerButton() {
on = !on
}
}
class TVSetSpec extends AnyFeatureSpec {
Feature("TV power button") {
Scenario("User presses power button when TV is off", Slow) {
val tv = new TVSet
assert(!tv.isOn)
tv.pressPowerButton()
assert(tv.isOn)
}
Scenario("User presses power button when TV is on", Slow, DbTest) {
val tv = new TVSet
tv.pressPowerButton()
assert(tv.isOn)
tv.pressPowerButton()
assert(!tv.isOn)
}
}
}
This code marks both tests with the org.scalatest.tags.Slow tag,
and the second test with the com.mycompany.tags.DbTest tag.
The run method takes a Filter, whose constructor takes an optional
Set[String] called tagsToInclude and a Set[String] called
tagsToExclude. If tagsToInclude is None, all tests will be run
except those those belonging to tags listed in the
tagsToExclude Set. If tagsToInclude is defined, only tests
belonging to tags mentioned in the tagsToInclude set, and not mentioned in tagsToExclude,
will be run.
It is recommended, though not required, that you create a corresponding tag annotation when you
create a Tag object. A tag annotation (on the JVM, not Scala.js) allows you to tag all the tests of a AnyFeatureSpec in
one stroke by annotating the class. For more information and examples, see the
documentation for class Tag. On Scala.js, to tag all tests of a suite, you'll need to
tag each test individually at the test site.
== Shared fixtures ==
A test fixture is composed of the objects and other artifacts (files, sockets, database connections, etc.) tests use to do their work. When multiple tests need to work with the same fixtures, it is important to try and avoid duplicating the fixture code across those tests. The more code duplication you have in your tests, the greater drag the tests will have on refactoring the actual production code.
ScalaTest recommends three techniques to eliminate such code duplication:
-
Refactor using Scala
-
Override
withFixture -
Mix in a before-and-after trait
Each technique is geared towards helping you reduce code duplication without introducing
instance vars, shared mutable objects, or other dependencies between tests. Eliminating shared
mutable state across tests will make your test code easier to reason about and more amenable for parallel
test execution.
The following sections describe these techniques, including explaining the recommended usage for each. But first, here's a table summarizing the options:
| Refactor using Scala when different tests need different fixtures. | |
| get-fixture methods | The extract method refactor helps you create a fresh instances of mutable fixture objects in each test that needs them, but doesn't help you clean them up when you're done. |
| fixture-context objects | By placing fixture methods and fields into traits, you can easily give each test just the newly created fixtures it needs by mixing together traits. Use this technique when you need different combinations of mutable fixture objects in different tests, and don't need to clean up after. |
| loan-fixture methods | Factor out dupicate code with the loan pattern when different tests need different fixtures that must be cleaned up afterwards. |
Override withFixture when most or all tests need the same fixture.
|
|
withFixture(NoArgTest)
|
The recommended default approach when most or all tests need the same fixture treatment. This general technique allows you, for example, to perform side effects at the beginning and end of all or most tests, transform the outcome of tests, retry tests, make decisions based on test names, tags, or other test data. Use this technique unless:
|
withFixture(OneArgTest)
|
Use when you want to pass the same fixture object or objects as a parameter into all or most tests. |
| Mix in a before-and-after trait when you want an aborted suite, not a failed test, if the fixture code fails. | |
BeforeAndAfter
|
Use this boilerplate-buster when you need to perform the same side-effects before and/or after tests, rather than at the beginning or end of tests. |
BeforeAndAfterEach
|
Use when you want to stack traits that perform the same side-effects before and/or after tests, rather than at the beginning or end of tests. |
==== Calling get-fixture methods ====
If you need to create the same mutable fixture objects in multiple tests, and don't need to clean them up after using them, the simplest approach is to write one or more get-fixture methods. A get-fixture method returns a new instance of a needed fixture object (or a holder object containing multiple fixture objects) each time it is called. You can call a get-fixture method at the beginning of each test that needs the fixture, storing the returned object or objects in local variables. Here's an example:
package org.scalatest.examples.featurespec.getfixture
import org.scalatest.featurespec.AnyFeatureSpec
import collection.mutable.ListBuffer
class ExampleSpec extends AnyFeatureSpec {
class Fixture {
val builder = new StringBuilder("ScalaTest is designed to ")
val buffer = new ListBuffer[String]
}
def fixture = new Fixture
Feature("Simplicity") {
Scenario("User needs to read test code written by others") {
val f = fixture
f.builder.append("encourage clear code!")
assert(f.builder.toString === "ScalaTest is designed to encourage clear code!")
assert(f.buffer.isEmpty)
f.buffer += "sweet"
}
Scenario("User needs to understand what the tests are doing") {
val f = fixture
f.builder.append("be easy to reason about!")
assert(f.builder.toString === "ScalaTest is designed to be easy to reason about!")
assert(f.buffer.isEmpty)
}
}
}
The “f.” in front of each use of a fixture object provides a visual indication of which objects
are part of the fixture, but if you prefer, you can import the the members with “import f._” and use the names directly.
If you need to configure fixture objects differently in different tests, you can pass configuration into the get-fixture method. For example, you could pass in an initial value for a mutable fixture object as a parameter to the get-fixture method.
==== Instantiating fixture-context objects ====
An alternate technique that is especially useful when different tests need different combinations of fixture objects is to define the fixture objects as instance variables of fixture-context objects whose instantiation forms the body of tests. Like get-fixture methods, fixture-context objects are only appropriate if you don't need to clean up the fixtures after using them.
To use this technique, you define instance variables intialized with fixture objects in traits and/or classes, then in each test instantiate an object that contains just the fixture objects needed by the test. Traits allow you to mix together just the fixture objects needed by each test, whereas classes allow you to pass data in via a constructor to configure the fixture objects. Here's an example in which fixture objects are partitioned into two traits and each test just mixes together the traits it needs:
package org.scalatest.examples.featurespec.fixturecontext
import collection.mutable.ListBuffer
import org.scalatest.featurespec.AnyFeatureSpec
class ExampleSpec extends AnyFeatureSpec {
trait Builder {
val builder = new StringBuilder("ScalaTest is designed to ")
}
trait Buffer {
val buffer = ListBuffer("ScalaTest", "is", "designed", "to")
}
Feature("Simplicity") {
// This test needs the StringBuilder fixture
Scenario("User needs to read test code written by others") {
new Builder {
builder.append("encourage clear code!")
assert(builder.toString === "ScalaTest is designed to encourage clear code!")
}
}
// This test needs the ListBuffer[String] fixture
Scenario("User needs to understand what the tests are doing") {
new Buffer {
buffer += ("be", "easy", "to", "reason", "about!")
assert(buffer === List("ScalaTest", "is", "designed", "to", "be", "easy", "to", "reason", "about!"))
}
}
// This test needs both the StringBuilder and ListBuffer
Scenario("User needs to write tests") {
new Builder with Buffer {
builder.append("be easy to learn!")
buffer += ("be", "easy", "to", "remember", "how", "to", "write!")
assert(builder.toString === "ScalaTest is designed to be easy to learn!")
assert(buffer === List("ScalaTest", "is", "designed", "to", "be", "easy",
"to", "remember", "how", "to", "write!"))
}
}
}
}
==== Overriding withFixture(NoArgTest) ====
Although the get-fixture method and fixture-context object approaches take care of setting up a fixture at the beginning of each
test, they don't address the problem of cleaning up a fixture at the end of the test. If you just need to perform a side-effect at the beginning or end of
a test, and don't need to actually pass any fixture objects into the test, you can override withFixture(NoArgTest), one of ScalaTest's
lifecycle methods defined in trait Suite.
Trait Suite's implementation of runTest passes a no-arg test function to withFixture(NoArgTest). It is withFixture's
responsibility to invoke that test function. Suite's implementation of withFixture simply
invokes the function, like this:
// Default implementation in trait Suite
protected def withFixture(test: NoArgTest) = {
test()
}
You can, therefore, override withFixture to perform setup before and/or cleanup after invoking the test function. If
you have cleanup to perform, you should invoke the test function inside a try block and perform the cleanup in
a finally clause, in case an exception propagates back through withFixture. (If a test fails because of an exception,
the test function invoked by withFixture will result in a <code>Failed</code> wrapping the exception. Nevertheless,
best practice is to perform cleanup in a finally clause just in case an exception occurs.)
The withFixture method is designed to be stacked, and to enable this, you should always call the super implementation
of withFixture, and let it invoke the test function rather than invoking the test function directly. That is to say, instead of writing
“test()”, you should write “super.withFixture(test)”, like this:
// Your implementation
override def withFixture(test: NoArgTest) = {
// Perform setup
try super.withFixture(test) // Invoke the test function
finally {
// Perform cleanup
}
}
Here's an example in which withFixture(NoArgTest) is used to take a snapshot of the working directory if a test fails, and
send that information to the reporter:
package org.scalatest.examples.featurespec.noargtest
import java.io.File
import org.scalatest._
class ExampleSpec extends featurespec.AnyFeatureSpec {
override def withFixture(test: NoArgTest) = {
super.withFixture(test) match {
case failed: Failed =>
val currDir = new File(".")
val fileNames = currDir.list()
info("Dir snapshot: " + fileNames.mkString(", "))
failed
case other => other
}
}
Scenario("This scenario should succeed") {
assert(1 + 1 === 2)
}
Scenario("This scenario should fail") {
assert(1 + 1 === 3)
}
}
Running this version of ExampleSuite in the interpreter in a directory with two files, hello.txt and world.txt
would give the following output:
scala> org.scalatest.run(new ExampleSpec) ExampleSpec: Scenario: This scenario should succeed Scenario: This scenario should fail *** FAILED *** 2 did not equal 3 (:115) + Dir snapshot: hello.txt, world.txt
Note that the NoArgTest passed to withFixture, in addition to
an apply method that executes the test, also includes the test name and the config
map passed to runTest. Thus you can also use the test name and configuration objects in your withFixture
implementation.
==== Calling loan-fixture methods ====
If you need to both pass a fixture object into a test and perform cleanup at the end of the test, you'll need to use the loan pattern. If different tests need different fixtures that require cleanup, you can implement the loan pattern directly by writing loan-fixture methods. A loan-fixture method takes a function whose body forms part or all of a test's code. It creates a fixture, passes it to the test code by invoking the function, then cleans up the fixture after the function returns.
The following example shows three tests that use two fixtures, a database and a file. Both require cleanup after, so each is provided via a
loan-fixture method. (In this example, the database is simulated with a StringBuffer.)
package org.scalatest.examples.featurespec.loanfixture
import java.util.concurrent.ConcurrentHashMap
object DbServer { // Simulating a database server
type Db = StringBuffer
private val databases = new ConcurrentHashMap[String, Db]
def createDb(name: String): Db = {
val db = new StringBuffer
databases.put(name, db)
db
}
def removeDb(name: String) {
databases.remove(name)
}
}
import org.scalatest.featurespec.AnyFeatureSpec
import DbServer._
import java.util.UUID.randomUUID
import java.io._
class ExampleSpec extends AnyFeatureSpec {
def withDatabase(testCode: Db => Any) {
val dbName = randomUUID.toString
val db = createDb(dbName) // create the fixture
try {
db.append("ScalaTest is designed to ") // perform setup
testCode(db) // "loan" the fixture to the test
}
finally removeDb(dbName) // clean up the fixture
}
def withFile(testCode: (File, FileWriter) => Any) {
val file = File.createTempFile("hello", "world") // create the fixture
val writer = new FileWriter(file)
try {
writer.write("ScalaTest is designed to ") // set up the fixture
testCode(file, writer) // "loan" the fixture to the test
}
finally writer.close() // clean up the fixture
}
Feature("Simplicity") {
// This test needs the file fixture
Scenario("User needs to read test code written by others") {
withFile { (file, writer) =>
writer.write("encourage clear code!")
writer.flush()
assert(file.length === 46)
}
}
// This test needs the database fixture
Scenario("User needs to understand what the tests are doing") {
withDatabase { db =>
db.append("be easy to reason about!")
assert(db.toString === "ScalaTest is designed to be easy to reason about!")
}
}
// This test needs both the file and the database
Scenario("User needs to write tests") {
withDatabase { db =>
withFile { (file, writer) => // loan-fixture methods compose
db.append("be easy to learn!")
writer.write("be easy to remember how to write!")
writer.flush()
assert(db.toString === "ScalaTest is designed to be easy to learn!")
assert(file.length === 58)
}
}
}
}
}
As demonstrated by the last test, loan-fixture methods compose. Not only do loan-fixture methods allow you to give each test the fixture it needs, they allow you to give a test multiple fixtures and clean everything up afterwards.
Also demonstrated in this example is the technique of giving each test its own "fixture sandbox" to play in. When your fixtures involve external side-effects, like creating files or databases, it is a good idea to give each file or database a unique name as is done in this example. This keeps tests completely isolated, allowing you to run them in parallel if desired.
==== Overriding withFixture(OneArgTest) ====
If all or most tests need the same fixture, you can avoid some of the boilerplate of the loan-fixture method approach by using a FixtureAnyFeatureSpec
and overriding withFixture(OneArgTest).
Each test in a FixtureAnyFeatureSpec takes a fixture as a parameter, allowing you to pass the fixture into
the test. You must indicate the type of the fixture parameter by specifying FixtureParam, and implement a
withFixture method that takes a OneArgTest. This withFixture method is responsible for
invoking the one-arg test function, so you can perform fixture set up before, and clean up after, invoking and passing
the fixture into the test function.
To enable the stacking of traits that define withFixture(NoArgTest), it is a good idea to let
withFixture(NoArgTest) invoke the test function instead of invoking the test
function directly. To do so, you'll need to convert the OneArgTest to a NoArgTest. You can do that by passing
the fixture object to the toNoArgTest method of OneArgTest. In other words, instead of
writing “test(theFixture)”, you'd delegate responsibility for
invoking the test function to the withFixture(NoArgTest) method of the same instance by writing:
withFixture(test.toNoArgTest(theFixture))
Here's a complete example:
package org.scalatest.examples.featurespec.oneargtest
import org.scalatest.featurespec
import java.io._
class ExampleSpec extends featurespec.FixtureAnyFeatureSpec {
case class FixtureParam(file: File, writer: FileWriter)
def withFixture(test: OneArgTest) = {
// create the fixture
val file = File.createTempFile("hello", "world")
val writer = new FileWriter(file)
val theFixture = FixtureParam(file, writer)
try {
writer.write("ScalaTest is designed to be ") // set up the fixture
withFixture(test.toNoArgTest(theFixture)) // "loan" the fixture to the test
}
finally writer.close() // clean up the fixture
}
Feature("Simplicity") {
Scenario("User needs to read test code written by others") { f =>
f.writer.write("encourage clear code!")
f.writer.flush()
assert(f.file.length === 49)
}
Scenario("User needs to understand what the tests are doing") { f =>
f.writer.write("be easy to reason about!")
f.writer.flush()
assert(f.file.length === 52)
}
}
}
In this example, the tests actually required two fixture objects, a File and a FileWriter. In such situations you can
simply define the FixtureParam type to be a tuple containing the objects, or as is done in this example, a case class containing
the objects. For more information on the withFixture(OneArgTest) technique, see the documentation for FixtureAnyFeatureSpec.
==== Mixing in BeforeAndAfter ====
In all the shared fixture examples shown so far, the activities of creating, setting up, and cleaning up the fixture objects have been
performed during the test. This means that if an exception occurs during any of these activities, it will be reported as a test failure.
Sometimes, however, you may want setup to happen before the test starts, and cleanup after the test has completed, so that if an
exception occurs during setup or cleanup, the entire suite aborts and no more tests are attempted. The simplest way to accomplish this in ScalaTest is
to mix in trait BeforeAndAfter. With this trait you can denote a bit of code to run before each test
with before and/or after each test each test with after, like this:
package org.scalatest.examples.featurespec.beforeandafter
import org.scalatest._
import collection.mutable.ListBuffer
class ExampleSpec extends featurespec.AnyFeatureSpec with BeforeAndAfter {
val builder = new StringBuilder
val buffer = new ListBuffer[String]
before {
builder.append("ScalaTest is designed to ")
}
after {
builder.clear()
buffer.clear()
}
Feature("Simplicity") {
Scenario("User needs to read test code written by others") {
builder.append("encourage clear code!")
assert(builder.toString === "ScalaTest is designed to encourage clear code!")
assert(buffer.isEmpty)
buffer += "sweet"
}
Scenario("User needs to understand what the tests are doing") {
builder.append("be easy to reason about!")
assert(builder.toString === "ScalaTest is designed to be easy to reason about!")
assert(buffer.isEmpty)
}
}
}
Note that the only way before and after code can communicate with test code is via some side-effecting mechanism, commonly by
reassigning instance vars or by changing the state of mutable objects held from instance vals (as in this example). If using
instance vars or mutable objects held from instance vals you wouldn't be able to run tests in parallel in the same instance
of the test class (on the JVM, not Scala.js) unless you synchronized access to the shared, mutable state. This is why ScalaTest's ParallelTestExecution trait extends
OneInstancePerTest. By running each test in its own instance of the class, each test has its own copy of the instance variables, so you
don't need to synchronize. If you mixed ParallelTestExecution into the ExampleSuite above, the tests would run in parallel just fine
without any synchronization needed on the mutable StringBuilder and ListBuffer[String] objects.
Although BeforeAndAfter provides a minimal-boilerplate way to execute code before and after tests, it isn't designed to enable stackable
traits, because the order of execution would be non-obvious. If you want to factor out before and after code that is common to multiple test suites, you
should use trait BeforeAndAfterEach instead, as shown later in the next section,
composing fixtures by stacking traits.
== Composing fixtures by stacking traits ==
In larger projects, teams often end up with several different fixtures that test classes need in different combinations,
and possibly initialized (and cleaned up) in different orders. A good way to accomplish this in ScalaTest is to factor the individual
fixtures into traits that can be composed using the stackable trait pattern. This can be done, for example, by placing
withFixture methods in several traits, each of which call super.withFixture. Here's an example in
which the StringBuilder and ListBuffer[String] fixtures used in the previous examples have been
factored out into two stackable fixture traits named Builder and Buffer:
package org.scalatest.examples.featurespec.composingwithfixture
import org.scalatest._
import collection.mutable.ListBuffer
trait Builder extends TestSuiteMixin { this: TestSuite =>
val builder = new StringBuilder
abstract override def withFixture(test: NoArgTest) = {
builder.append("ScalaTest is designed to ")
try super.withFixture(test) // To be stackable, must call super.withFixture
finally builder.clear()
}
}
trait Buffer extends TestSuiteMixin { this: TestSuite =>
val buffer = new ListBuffer[String]
abstract override def withFixture(test: NoArgTest) = {
try super.withFixture(test) // To be stackable, must call super.withFixture
finally buffer.clear()
}
}
class ExampleSpec extends featurespec.AnyFeatureSpec with Builder with Buffer {
Feature("Simplicity") {
Scenario("User needs to read test code written by others") {
builder.append("encourage clear code!")
assert(builder.toString === "ScalaTest is designed to encourage clear code!")
assert(buffer.isEmpty)
buffer += "clear"
}
Scenario("User needs to understand what the tests are doing") {
builder.append("be easy to reason about!")
assert(builder.toString === "ScalaTest is designed to be easy to reason about!")
assert(buffer.isEmpty)
buffer += "easy"
}
}
}
By mixing in both the Builder and Buffer traits, ExampleSuite gets both fixtures, which will be
initialized before each test and cleaned up after. The order the traits are mixed together determines the order of execution.
In this case, Builder is “super” to Buffer. If you wanted Buffer to be “super”
to Builder, you need only switch the order you mix them together, like this:
class Example2Spec extends AnyFeatureSpec with Buffer with Builder
And if you only need one fixture you mix in only that trait:
class Example3Spec extends AnyFeatureSpec with Builder
Another way to create stackable fixture traits is by extending the BeforeAndAfterEach
and/or BeforeAndAfterAll traits.
BeforeAndAfterEach has a beforeEach method that will be run before each test (like JUnit's setUp),
and an afterEach method that will be run after (like JUnit's tearDown).
Similarly, BeforeAndAfterAll has a beforeAll method that will be run before all tests,
and an afterAll method that will be run after all tests. Here's what the previously shown example would look like if it
were rewritten to use the BeforeAndAfterEach methods instead of withFixture:
package org.scalatest.examples.featurespec.composingbeforeandaftereach
import org.scalatest._
import collection.mutable.ListBuffer
trait Builder extends BeforeAndAfterEach { this: Suite =>
val builder = new StringBuilder
override def beforeEach() {
builder.append("ScalaTest is designed to ")
super.beforeEach() // To be stackable, must call super.beforeEach
}
override def afterEach() {
try super.afterEach() // To be stackable, must call super.afterEach
finally builder.clear()
}
}
trait Buffer extends BeforeAndAfterEach { this: Suite =>
val buffer = new ListBuffer[String]
override def afterEach() {
try super.afterEach() // To be stackable, must call super.afterEach
finally buffer.clear()
}
}
class ExampleSpec extends featurespec.AnyFeatureSpec with Builder with Buffer {
Feature("Simplicity") {
Scenario("User needs to read test code written by others") {
builder.append("encourage clear code!")
assert(builder.toString === "ScalaTest is designed to encourage clear code!")
assert(buffer.isEmpty)
buffer += "clear"
}
Scenario("User needs to understand what the tests are doing") {
builder.append("be easy to reason about!")
assert(builder.toString === "ScalaTest is designed to be easy to reason about!")
assert(buffer.isEmpty)
buffer += "easy"
}
}
}
To get the same ordering as withFixture, place your super.beforeEach call at the end of each
beforeEach method, and the super.afterEach call at the beginning of each afterEach
method, as shown in the previous example. It is a good idea to invoke super.afterEach in a try
block and perform cleanup in a finally clause, as shown in the previous example, because this ensures the
cleanup code is performed even if super.afterEach throws an exception.
The difference between stacking traits that extend BeforeAndAfterEach versus traits that implement withFixture is
that setup and cleanup code happens before and after the test in BeforeAndAfterEach, but at the beginning and
end of the test in withFixture. Thus if a withFixture method completes abruptly with an exception, it is
considered a failed test. By contrast, if any of the beforeEach or afterEach methods of BeforeAndAfterEach
complete abruptly, it is considered an aborted suite, which will result in a SuiteAborted event.
Sometimes you may want to run the same test code on different fixture objects. In other words, you may want to write tests that are "shared"
by different fixture objects.
To accomplish this in a AnyFeatureSpec, you first place shared tests (i.e., shared scenarios) in
behavior functions. These behavior functions will be
invoked during the construction phase of any AnyFeatureSpec that uses them, so that the scenarios they contain will
be registered as scenarios in that AnyFeatureSpec.
For example, given this stack class:
import scala.collection.mutable.ListBuffer
class Stack[T] {
val MAX = 10
private val buf = new ListBuffer[T]
def push(o: T) {
if (!full)
buf.prepend(o)
else
throw new IllegalStateException("can't push onto a full stack")
}
def pop(): T = {
if (!empty)
buf.remove(0)
else
throw new IllegalStateException("can't pop an empty stack")
}
def peek: T = {
if (!empty)
buf(0)
else
throw new IllegalStateException("can't pop an empty stack")
}
def full: Boolean = buf.size == MAX
def empty: Boolean = buf.size == 0
def size = buf.size
override def toString = buf.mkString("Stack(", ", ", ")")
}
You may want to test the Stack class in different states: empty, full, with one item, with one item less than capacity,
etc. You may find you have several scenarios that make sense any time the stack is non-empty. Thus you'd ideally want to run
those same scenarios for three stack fixture objects: a full stack, a stack with a one item, and a stack with one item less than
capacity. With shared tests, you can factor these scenarios out into a behavior function, into which you pass the
stack fixture to use when running the tests. So in your AnyFeatureSpec for stack, you'd invoke the
behavior function three times, passing in each of the three stack fixtures so that the shared scenarios are run for all three fixtures.
You can define a behavior function that encapsulates these shared scenarios inside the AnyFeatureSpec that uses them. If they are shared
between different AnyFeatureSpecs, however, you could also define them in a separate trait that is mixed into
each AnyFeatureSpec that uses them.
For example, here the nonEmptyStack behavior function (in this case, a
behavior method) is defined in a trait along with another
method containing shared scenarios for non-full stacks:
import org.scalatest.featurespec.AnyFeatureSpec
import org.scalatest.GivenWhenThen
import org.scalatestexamples.helpers.Stack
trait FeatureSpecStackBehaviors { this: AnyFeatureSpec with GivenWhenThen =>
def nonEmptyStack(createNonEmptyStack: => Stack[Int], lastItemAdded: Int) {
Scenario("empty is invoked on this non-empty stack: " + createNonEmptyStack.toString) {
Given("a non-empty stack")
val stack = createNonEmptyStack
When("empty is invoked on the stack")
Then("empty returns false")
assert(!stack.empty)
}
Scenario("peek is invoked on this non-empty stack: " + createNonEmptyStack.toString) {
Given("a non-empty stack")
val stack = createNonEmptyStack
val size = stack.size
When("peek is invoked on the stack")
Then("peek returns the last item added")
assert(stack.peek === lastItemAdded)
And("the size of the stack is the same as before")
assert(stack.size === size)
}
Scenario("pop is invoked on this non-empty stack: " + createNonEmptyStack.toString) {
Given("a non-empty stack")
val stack = createNonEmptyStack
val size = stack.size
When("pop is invoked on the stack")
Then("pop returns the last item added")
assert(stack.pop === lastItemAdded)
And("the size of the stack one less than before")
assert(stack.size === size - 1)
}
}
def nonFullStack(createNonFullStack: => Stack[Int]) {
Scenario("full is invoked on this non-full stack: " + createNonFullStack.toString) {
Given("a non-full stack")
val stack = createNonFullStack
When("full is invoked on the stack")
Then("full returns false")
assert(!stack.full)
}
Scenario("push is invoked on this non-full stack: " + createNonFullStack.toString) {
Given("a non-full stack")
val stack = createNonFullStack
val size = stack.size
When("push is invoked on the stack")
stack.push(7)
Then("the size of the stack is one greater than before")
assert(stack.size === size + 1)
And("the top of the stack contains the pushed value")
assert(stack.peek === 7)
}
}
}
Given these behavior functions, you could invoke them directly, but AnyFeatureSpec offers a DSL for the purpose,
which looks like this:
ScenariosFor(nonEmptyStack(stackWithOneItem, lastValuePushed)) ScenariosFor(nonFullStack(stackWithOneItem))
If you prefer to use an imperative style to change fixtures, for example by mixing in BeforeAndAfterEach and
reassigning a stack var in beforeEach, you could write your behavior functions
in the context of that var, which means you wouldn't need to pass in the stack fixture because it would be
in scope already inside the behavior function. In that case, your code would look like this:
ScenariosFor(nonEmptyStack) // assuming lastValuePushed is also in scope inside nonEmptyStack ScenariosFor(nonFullStack)
The recommended style, however, is the functional, pass-all-the-needed-values-in style. Here's an example:
import org.scalatest.featurespec.AnyFeatureSpec
import org.scalatest.GivenWhenThen
import org.scalatestexamples.helpers.Stack
class StackFeatureSpec extends AnyFeatureSpec with GivenWhenThen with FeatureSpecStackBehaviors {
// Stack fixture creation methods
def emptyStack = new Stack[Int]
def fullStack = {
val stack = new Stack[Int]
for (i <- 0 until stack.MAX)
stack.push(i)
stack
}
def stackWithOneItem = {
val stack = new Stack[Int]
stack.push(9)
stack
}
def stackWithOneItemLessThanCapacity = {
val stack = new Stack[Int]
for (i <- 1 to 9)
stack.push(i)
stack
}
val lastValuePushed = 9
Feature("A Stack is pushed and popped") {
Scenario("empty is invoked on an empty stack") {
Given("an empty stack")
val stack = emptyStack
When("empty is invoked on the stack")
Then("empty returns true")
assert(stack.empty)
}
Scenario("peek is invoked on an empty stack") {
Given("an empty stack")
val stack = emptyStack
When("peek is invoked on the stack")
Then("peek throws IllegalStateException")
assertThrows[IllegalStateException] {
stack.peek
}
}
Scenario("pop is invoked on an empty stack") {
Given("an empty stack")
val stack = emptyStack
When("pop is invoked on the stack")
Then("pop throws IllegalStateException")
assertThrows[IllegalStateException] {
emptyStack.pop
}
}
ScenariosFor(nonEmptyStack(stackWithOneItem, lastValuePushed))
ScenariosFor(nonFullStack(stackWithOneItem))
ScenariosFor(nonEmptyStack(stackWithOneItemLessThanCapacity, lastValuePushed))
ScenariosFor(nonFullStack(stackWithOneItemLessThanCapacity))
Scenario("full is invoked on a full stack") {
Given("an full stack")
val stack = fullStack
When("full is invoked on the stack")
Then("full returns true")
assert(stack.full)
}
ScenariosFor(nonEmptyStack(fullStack, lastValuePushed))
Scenario("push is invoked on a full stack") {
Given("an full stack")
val stack = fullStack
When("push is invoked on the stack")
Then("push throws IllegalStateException")
assertThrows[IllegalStateException] {
stack.push(10)
}
}
}
}
If you load these classes into the Scala interpreter (with scalatest's JAR file on the class path), and execute it, you'll see:
scala> (new StackFeatureSpec).execute()
Feature: A Stack is pushed and popped
Scenario: empty is invoked on an empty stack
Given an empty stack
When empty is invoked on the stack
Then empty returns true
Scenario: peek is invoked on an empty stack
Given an empty stack
When peek is invoked on the stack
Then peek throws IllegalStateException
Scenario: pop is invoked on an empty stack
Given an empty stack
When pop is invoked on the stack
Then pop throws IllegalStateException
Scenario: empty is invoked on this non-empty stack: Stack(9)
Given a non-empty stack
When empty is invoked on the stack
Then empty returns false
Scenario: peek is invoked on this non-empty stack: Stack(9)
Given a non-empty stack
When peek is invoked on the stack
Then peek returns the last item added
And the size of the stack is the same as before
Scenario: pop is invoked on this non-empty stack: Stack(9)
Given a non-empty stack
When pop is invoked on the stack
Then pop returns the last item added
And the size of the stack one less than before
Scenario: full is invoked on this non-full stack: Stack(9)
Given a non-full stack
When full is invoked on the stack
Then full returns false
Scenario: push is invoked on this non-full stack: Stack(9)
Given a non-full stack
When push is invoked on the stack
Then the size of the stack is one greater than before
And the top of the stack contains the pushed value
Scenario: empty is invoked on this non-empty stack: Stack(9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1)
Given a non-empty stack
When empty is invoked on the stack
Then empty returns false
Scenario: peek is invoked on this non-empty stack: Stack(9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1)
Given a non-empty stack
When peek is invoked on the stack
Then peek returns the last item added
And the size of the stack is the same as before
Scenario: pop is invoked on this non-empty stack: Stack(9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1)
Given a non-empty stack
When pop is invoked on the stack
Then pop returns the last item added
And the size of the stack one less than before
Scenario: full is invoked on this non-full stack: Stack(9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1)
Given a non-full stack
When full is invoked on the stack
Then full returns false
Scenario: push is invoked on this non-full stack: Stack(9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1)
Given a non-full stack
When push is invoked on the stack
Then the size of the stack is one greater than before
And the top of the stack contains the pushed value
Scenario: full is invoked on a full stack
Given an full stack
When full is invoked on the stack
Then full returns true
Scenario: empty is invoked on this non-empty stack: Stack(9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1, 0)
Given a non-empty stack
When empty is invoked on the stack
Then empty returns false
Scenario: peek is invoked on this non-empty stack: Stack(9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1, 0)
Given a non-empty stack
When peek is invoked on the stack
Then peek returns the last item added
And the size of the stack is the same as before
Scenario: pop is invoked on this non-empty stack: Stack(9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1, 0)
Given a non-empty stack
When pop is invoked on the stack
Then pop returns the last item added
And the size of the stack one less than before
Scenario: push is invoked on a full stack
Given an full stack
When push is invoked on the stack
Then push throws IllegalStateException
One thing to keep in mind when using shared tests is that in ScalaTest, each test in a suite must have a unique name.
If you register the same tests repeatedly in the same suite, one problem you may encounter is an exception at runtime
complaining that multiple tests are being registered with the same test name.
Although in a AnyFeatureSpec, the feature clause is a nesting construct analogous to
FunSpec's describe clause, you many sometimes need to do a bit of
extra work to ensure that the test names are unique. If a duplicate test name problem shows up in a
AnyFeatureSpec, you can pass in a prefix or suffix string to add to each test name. You can pass this string
the same way you pass any other data needed by the shared tests, or just call toString on the shared fixture object.
This is the approach taken by the previous AnyFeatureSpecStackBehaviors example.
Given this AnyFeatureSpecStackBehaviors trait, calling it with the stackWithOneItem fixture, like this:
ScenariosFor(nonEmptyStack(stackWithOneItem, lastValuePushed))
yields test names:
-
empty is invoked on this non-empty stack: Stack(9) -
peek is invoked on this non-empty stack: Stack(9) -
pop is invoked on this non-empty stack: Stack(9)
Whereas calling it with the stackWithOneItemLessThanCapacity fixture, like this:
ScenariosFor(nonEmptyStack(stackWithOneItemLessThanCapacity, lastValuePushed))
yields different test names:
-
empty is invoked on this non-empty stack: Stack(9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1) -
peek is invoked on this non-empty stack: Stack(9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1) -
pop is invoked on this non-empty stack: Stack(9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1)
Implementation trait for class AnyFeatureSpec, which represents
a suite of tests in which each test represents one scenario of a
feature.
Implementation trait for class AnyFeatureSpec, which represents
a suite of tests in which each test represents one scenario of a
feature.
AnyFeatureSpec is a class, not a
trait, to minimize compile time given there is a slight compiler overhead to
mixing in traits compared to extending classes. If you need to mix the
behavior of AnyFeatureSpec into some other class, you can use this
trait instead, because class AnyFeatureSpec does nothing more than
extend this trait and add a nice toString implementation.
See the documentation of the class for a detailed
overview of AnyFeatureSpec.
Enables testing of asynchronous code without blocking,
using a style consistent with traditional AnyFeatureSpec tests.
Enables testing of asynchronous code without blocking,
using a style consistent with traditional AnyFeatureSpec tests.
Recommended Usage:
AsyncFeatureSpec is intended to enable users of AnyFeatureSpec
to write non-blocking asynchronous tests that are consistent with their traditional AnyFeatureSpec tests.
Note: AsyncFeatureSpec is intended for use in special situations where non-blocking asynchronous
testing is needed, with class AnyFeatureSpec used for general needs.
|
Given a Future returned by the code you are testing,
you need not block until the Future completes before
performing assertions against its value. You can instead map those
assertions onto the Future and return the resulting
Future[Assertion] to ScalaTest. The test will complete
asynchronously, when the Future[Assertion] completes.
Although not required, AsyncFeatureSpec is often used together with GivenWhenThen to express acceptance requirements
in more detail.
Here's an example AsyncFeatureSpec:
package org.scalatest.examples.asyncfeaturespec
import org.scalatest._
import scala.concurrent.Future
import scala.concurrent.ExecutionContext
// Defining actor messages
case object IsOn
case object PressPowerButton
class TVSetActor { // Simulating an actor
private var on: Boolean = false
def !(msg: PressPowerButton.type): Unit =
synchronized {
on = !on
}
def ?(msg: IsOn.type)(implicit c: ExecutionContext): Future[Boolean] =
Future {
synchronized { on }
}
}
class TVSetActorSpec extends featurespec.AsyncFeatureSpec with GivenWhenThen {
implicit override def executionContext =
scala.concurrent.ExecutionContext.Implicits.global
info("As a TV set owner")
info("I want to be able to turn the TV on and off")
info("So I can watch TV when I want")
info("And save energy when I'm not watching TV")
Feature("TV power button") {
Scenario("User presses power button when TV is off") {
Given("a TV set that is switched off")
val tvSetActor = new TVSetActor
When("the power button is pressed")
tvSetActor ! PressPowerButton
Then("the TV should switch on")
val futureBoolean = tvSetActor ? IsOn
futureBoolean map { isOn => assert(isOn) }
}
Scenario("User presses power button when TV is on") {
Given("a TV set that is switched on")
val tvSetActor = new TVSetActor
tvSetActor ! PressPowerButton
When("the power button is pressed")
tvSetActor ! PressPowerButton
Then("the TV should switch off")
val futureBoolean = tvSetActor ? IsOn
futureBoolean map { isOn => assert(!isOn) }
}
}
}
Note: for more information on the calls to Given, When, and Then, see the documentation
for trait GivenWhenThen and the Informers section below.
An AsyncFeatureSpec contains feature clauses and scenarios. You define a feature clause
with feature, and a scenario with scenario. Both
feature and scenario are methods, defined in
AsyncFeatureSpec, which will be invoked
by the primary constructor of TVSetActorSpec.
A feature clause describes a feature of the subject (class or other entity) you are specifying
and testing. In the previous example,
the subject under specification and test is a TV set. The feature being specified and tested is
the behavior of a TV set when its power button is pressed. With each scenario you provide a
string (the spec text) that specifies the behavior of the subject for
one scenario in which the feature may be used, and a block of code that tests that behavior.
You place the spec text between the parentheses, followed by the test code between curly
braces. The test code will be wrapped up as a function passed as a by-name parameter to
scenario, which will register the test for later execution.
The result type of the by-name in an AsyncFeatureSpec must
be Future[Assertion].
Starting with version 3.0.0, ScalaTest assertions and matchers have result type Assertion.
The result type of the first test in the example above, therefore, is Future[Assertion].
When an AsyncFeatureSpec is constructed, any test that results in Assertion will
be implicitly converted to Future[Assertion] and registered. The implicit conversion is from Assertion
to Future[Assertion] only, so you must end synchronous tests in some ScalaTest assertion
or matcher expression. If a test would not otherwise end in type Assertion, you can
place succeed at the end of the test. succeed, a field in trait Assertions,
returns the Succeeded singleton:
scala> succeed res2: org.scalatest.Assertion = Succeeded
Thus placing succeed at the end of a test body will satisfy the type checker.
An AsyncFeatureSpec's lifecycle has two phases: the registration phase and the
ready phase. It starts in registration phase and enters ready phase the first time
run is called on it. It then remains in ready phase for the remainder of its lifetime.
Scenarios can only be registered with the scenario method while the AsyncFeatureSpec is
in its registration phase. Any attempt to register a scenario after the AsyncFeatureSpec has
entered its ready phase, i.e., after run has been invoked on the AsyncFeatureSpec,
will be met with a thrown TestRegistrationClosedException. The
recommended style
of using AsyncFeatureSpec is to register tests during object construction as is done in all
the examples shown here. If you keep to the recommended style, you should never see a
TestRegistrationClosedException.
Each scenario represents one test. The name of the test is the spec text passed to the scenario method.
The feature name does not appear as part of the test name. In a AsyncFeatureSpec, therefore, you must take care
to ensure that each test has a unique name (in other words, that each scenario has unique spec text).
When you run a AsyncFeatureSpec, it will send Formatters in the events it sends to the
Reporter. ScalaTest's built-in reporters will report these events in such a way
that the output is easy to read as an informal specification of the subject being tested.
For example, were you to run TVSetSpec from within the Scala interpreter:
scala> org.scalatest.run(new TVSetActorSpec)
You would see:
TVSetActorSpec:
As a TV set owner
I want to be able to turn the TV on and off
So I can watch TV when I want
And save energy when I'm not watching TV
Feature: TV power button
Scenario: User presses power button when TV is off
Given a TV set that is switched off
When the power button is pressed
Then the TV should switch on
Scenario: User presses power button when TV is on
Given a TV set that is switched on
When the power button is pressed
Then the TV should switch off
Or, to run just the “Feature: TV power button Scenario: User presses power button when TV is on” method, you could pass that test's name, or any unique substring of the
name, such as "TV is on". Here's an example:
scala> org.scalatest.run(new TVSetActorSpec, "TV is on")
TVSetActorSpec:
As a TV set owner
I want to be able to turn the TV on and off
So I can watch TV when I want
And save energy when I'm not watching TV
Feature: TV power button
Scenario: User presses power button when TV is on
Given a TV set that is switched on
When the power button is pressed
Then the TV should switch off
== Asynchronous execution model ==
AsyncFeatureSpec extends AsyncTestSuite, which provides an
implicit scala.concurrent.ExecutionContext
named executionContext. This
execution context is used by AsyncFeatureSpec to
transform the Future[Assertion]s returned by each test
into the FutureOutcome returned by the test function
passed to withFixture.
This ExecutionContext is also intended to be used in the tests,
including when you map assertions onto futures.
On both the JVM and Scala.js, the default execution context provided by ScalaTest's asynchronous
testing styles confines execution to a single thread per test. On JavaScript, where single-threaded
execution is the only possibility, the default execution context is
scala.scalajs.concurrent.JSExecutionContext.Implicits.queue. On the JVM,
the default execution context is a serial execution context provided by ScalaTest itself.
When ScalaTest's serial execution context is called upon to execute a task, that task is recorded
in a queue for later execution. For example, one task that will be placed in this queue is the
task that transforms the Future[Assertion] returned by an asynchronous test body
to the FutureOutcome returned from the test function.
Other tasks that will be queued are any transformations of, or callbacks registered on, Futures that occur
in your test body, including any assertions you map onto Futures. Once the test body returns,
the thread that executed the test body will execute the tasks in that queue one after another, in the order they
were enqueued.
ScalaTest provides its serial execution context as the default on the JVM for three reasons. First, most often
running both tests and suites in parallel does not give a significant performance boost compared to
just running suites in parallel. Thus parallel execution of Future transformations within
individual tests is not generally needed for performance reasons.
Second, if multiple threads are operating in the same suite
concurrently, you'll need to make sure access to any mutable fixture objects by multiple threads is synchronized.
Although access to mutable state along
the same linear chain of Future transformations need not be synchronized,
this does not hold true for callbacks, and in general it is easy to make a mistake. Simply put: synchronizing access to
shared mutable state is difficult and error prone.
Because ScalaTest's default execution context on the JVM confines execution of Future transformations
and call backs to a single thread, you need not (by default) worry about synchronizing access to mutable state
in your asynchronous-style tests.
Third, asynchronous-style tests need not be complete when the test body returns, because the test body returns
a Future[Assertion]. This Future[Assertion] will often represent a test that has not yet
completed. As a result, when using a more traditional execution context backed by a thread-pool, you could
potentially start many more tests executing concurrently than there are threads in the thread pool. The more
concurrently execute tests you have competing for threads from the same limited thread pool, the more likely it
will be that tests will intermitently fail due to timeouts.
Using ScalaTest's serial execution context on the JVM will ensure the same thread that produced the Future[Assertion]
returned from a test body is also used to execute any tasks given to the execution context while executing the test
body—and that thread will not be allowed to do anything else until the test completes.
If the serial execution context's task queue ever becomes empty while the Future[Assertion] returned by
that test's body has not yet completed, the thread will block until another task for that test is enqueued. Although
it may seem counter-intuitive, this blocking behavior means the total number of tests allowed to run concurrently will be limited
to the total number of threads executing suites. This fact means you can tune the thread pool such that maximum performance
is reached while avoiding (or at least, reducing the likelihood of) tests that fail due to timeouts because of thread competition.
This thread confinement strategy does mean, however, that when you are using the default execution context on the JVM, you
must be sure to never block in the test body waiting for a task to be completed by the
execution context. If you block, your test will never complete. This kind of problem will be obvious, because the test will
consistently hang every time you run it. (If a test is hanging, and you're not sure which one it is,
enable slowpoke notifications.) If you really do
want to block in your tests, you may wish to just use a
traditional AnyFeatureSpec with
ScalaFutures instead. Alternatively, you could override
the executionContext and use a traditional ExecutionContext backed by a thread pool. This
will enable you to block in an asynchronous-style test on the JVM, but you'll need to worry about synchronizing access to
shared mutable state.
To use a different execution context, just override executionContext. For example, if you prefer to use
the runNow execution context on Scala.js instead of the default queue, you would write:
// on Scala.js implicit override def executionContext = org.scalatest.concurrent.TestExecutionContext.runNow
If you prefer on the JVM to use the global execution context, which is backed by a thread pool, instead of ScalaTest's default serial execution contex, which confines execution to a single thread, you would write:
// on the JVM (and also compiles on Scala.js, giving // you the queue execution context) implicit override def executionContext = scala.concurrent.ExecutionContext.Implicits.global
== Serial and parallel test execution ==
By default (unless you mix in ParallelTestExecution), tests in an AsyncFeatureSpec will be executed one after
another, i.e., serially. This is true whether those tests return Assertion or Future[Assertion],
no matter what threads are involved. This default behavior allows
you to re-use a shared fixture, such as an external database that needs to be cleaned
after each test, in multiple tests in async-style suites. This is implemented by registering each test, other than the first test, to run
as a continuation after the previous test completes.
If you want the tests of an AsyncFeatureSpec to be executed in parallel, you
must mix in ParallelTestExecution and enable parallel execution of tests in your build.
You enable parallel execution in Runner with the -P command line flag.
In the ScalaTest Maven Plugin, set parallel to true.
In sbt, parallel execution is the default, but to be explicit you can write:
parallelExecution in Test := true // the default in sbt
On the JVM, if both ParallelTestExecution is mixed in and
parallel execution is enabled in the build, tests in an async-style suite will be started in parallel, using threads from
the Distributor, and allowed to complete in parallel, using threads from the
executionContext. If you are using ScalaTest's serial execution context, the JVM default, asynchronous tests will
run in parallel very much like traditional (such as AnyFeatureSpec) tests run in
parallel: 1) Because ParallelTestExecution extends
OneInstancePerTest, each test will run in its own instance of the test class, you need not worry about synchronizing
access to mutable instance state shared by different tests in the same suite.
2) Because the serial execution context will confine the execution of each test to the single thread that executes the test body,
you need not worry about synchronizing access to shared mutable state accessed by transformations and callbacks of Futures
inside the test.
If ParallelTestExecution is mixed in but
parallel execution of suites is not enabled, asynchronous tests on the JVM will be started sequentially, by the single thread
that invoked run, but without waiting for one test to complete before the next test is started. As a result,
asynchronous tests will be allowed to complete in parallel, using threads
from the executionContext. If you are using the serial execution context, however, you'll see
the same behavior you see when parallel execution is disabled and a traditional suite that mixes in ParallelTestExecution
is executed: the tests will run sequentially. If you use an execution context backed by a thread-pool, such as global,
however, even though tests will be started sequentially by one thread, they will be allowed to run concurrently using threads from the
execution context's thread pool.
The latter behavior is essentially what you'll see on Scala.js when you execute a suite that mixes in ParallelTestExecution.
Because only one thread exists when running under JavaScript, you can't "enable parallel execution of suites." However, it may
still be useful to run tests in parallel on Scala.js, because tests can invoke API calls that are truly asynchronous by calling into
external APIs that take advantage of non-JavaScript threads. Thus on Scala.js, ParallelTestExecution allows asynchronous
tests to run in parallel, even though they must be started sequentially. This may give you better performance when you are using API
calls in your Scala.js tests that are truly asynchronous.
== Futures and expected exceptions ==
If you need to test for expected exceptions in the context of futures, you can use the
recoverToSucceededIf and recoverToExceptionIf methods of trait
RecoverMethods. Because this trait is mixed into
supertrait AsyncTestSuite, both of these methods are
available by default in an AsyncFeatureSpec.
If you just want to ensure that a future fails with a particular exception type, and do
not need to inspect the exception further, use recoverToSucceededIf:
recoverToSucceededIf[IllegalStateException] { // Result type: Future[Assertion]
emptyStackActor ? Peek
}
The recoverToSucceededIf method performs a job similar to
assertThrows, except
in the context of a future. It transforms a Future of any type into a
Future[Assertion] that succeeds only if the original future fails with the specified
exception. Here's an example in the REPL:
scala> import org.scalatest.RecoverMethods._
import org.scalatest.RecoverMethods._
scala> import scala.concurrent.Future
import scala.concurrent.Future
scala> import scala.concurrent.ExecutionContext.Implicits.global
import scala.concurrent.ExecutionContext.Implicits.global
scala> recoverToSucceededIf[IllegalStateException] {
| Future { throw new IllegalStateException }
| }
res0: scala.concurrent.Future[org.scalatest.Assertion] = ...
scala> res0.value
res1: Option[scala.util.Try[org.scalatest.Assertion]] = Some(Success(Succeeded))
Otherwise it fails with an error message similar to those given by assertThrows:
scala> recoverToSucceededIf[IllegalStateException] {
| Future { throw new RuntimeException }
| }
res2: scala.concurrent.Future[org.scalatest.Assertion] = ...
scala> res2.value
res3: Option[scala.util.Try[org.scalatest.Assertion]] =
Some(Failure(org.scalatest.exceptions.TestFailedException: Expected exception
java.lang.IllegalStateException to be thrown, but java.lang.RuntimeException
was thrown))
scala> recoverToSucceededIf[IllegalStateException] {
| Future { 42 }
| }
res4: scala.concurrent.Future[org.scalatest.Assertion] = ...
scala> res4.value
res5: Option[scala.util.Try[org.scalatest.Assertion]] =
Some(Failure(org.scalatest.exceptions.TestFailedException: Expected exception
java.lang.IllegalStateException to be thrown, but no exception was thrown))
The recoverToExceptionIf method differs from the recoverToSucceededIf in
its behavior when the assertion succeeds: recoverToSucceededIf yields a Future[Assertion],
whereas recoverToExceptionIf yields a Future[T], where T is the
expected exception type.
recoverToExceptionIf[IllegalStateException] { // Result type: Future[IllegalStateException]
emptyStackActor ? Peek
}
In other words, recoverToExpectionIf is to
intercept as
recovertToSucceededIf is to assertThrows. The first one allows you to
perform further assertions on the expected exception. The second one gives you a result type that will satisfy the type checker
at the end of the test body. Here's an example showing recoverToExceptionIf in the REPL:
scala> val futureEx =
| recoverToExceptionIf[IllegalStateException] {
| Future { throw new IllegalStateException("hello") }
| }
futureEx: scala.concurrent.Future[IllegalStateException] = ...
scala> futureEx.value
res6: Option[scala.util.Try[IllegalStateException]] =
Some(Success(java.lang.IllegalStateException: hello))
scala> futureEx map { ex => assert(ex.getMessage == "world") }
res7: scala.concurrent.Future[org.scalatest.Assertion] = ...
scala> res7.value
res8: Option[scala.util.Try[org.scalatest.Assertion]] =
Some(Failure(org.scalatest.exceptions.TestFailedException: "[hello]" did not equal "[world]"))
To support the common use case of temporarily disabling a test, with the
good intention of resurrecting the test at a later time, AsyncFeatureSpec provides registration
methods that start with ignore instead of scenario. Here's an example:
package org.scalatest.examples.asyncfeaturespec.ignore
import org.scalatest.featurespec.AsyncFeatureSpec
import scala.concurrent.Future
class AddSpec extends AsyncFeatureSpec {
def addSoon(addends: Int*): Future[Int] = Future { addends.sum }
def addNow(addends: Int*): Int = addends.sum
Feature("The add methods") {
ignore("addSoon will eventually compute a sum of passed Ints") {
val futureSum: Future[Int] = addSoon(1, 2)
// You can map assertions onto a Future, then return
// the resulting Future[Assertion] to ScalaTest:
futureSum map { sum => assert(sum == 3) }
}
Scenario("addNow will immediately compute a sum of passed Ints") {
val sum: Int = addNow(1, 2)
// You can also write synchronous tests. The body
// must have result type Assertion:
assert(sum == 3)
}
}
}
If you run class AddSpec with:
scala> org.scalatest.run(new AddSpec)
It will run only the second test and report that the first test was ignored:
AddSpec: Feature: The add methods - Scenario: addSoon will eventually compute a sum of passed Ints !!! IGNORED !!! - Scenario: addNow will immediately compute a sum of passed Ints
If you wish to temporarily ignore an entire suite of tests, you can (on the JVM, not Scala.js) annotate the test class with @Ignore, like this:
package org.scalatest.examples.asyncfeaturespec.ignoreall
import org.scalatest.featurespec.AsyncFeatureSpec
import scala.concurrent.Future
import org.scalatest.Ignore
@Ignore
class AddSpec extends AsyncFeatureSpec {
def addSoon(addends: Int*): Future[Int] = Future { addends.sum }
def addNow(addends: Int*): Int = addends.sum
Feature("The add methods") {
Scenario("addSoon will eventually compute a sum of passed Ints") {
val futureSum: Future[Int] = addSoon(1, 2)
// You can map assertions onto a Future, then return
// the resulting Future[Assertion] to ScalaTest:
futureSum map { sum => assert(sum == 3) }
}
Scenario("addNow will immediately compute a sum of passed Ints") {
val sum: Int = addNow(1, 2)
// You can also write synchronous tests. The body
// must have result type Assertion:
assert(sum == 3)
}
}
}
When you mark a test class with a tag annotation, ScalaTest will mark each test defined in that class with that tag.
Thus, marking the AddSpec in the above example with the @Ignore tag annotation means that both tests
in the class will be ignored. If you run the above AddSpec in the Scala interpreter, you'll see:
AddSpec: Feature: The add methods - Scenario: addSoon will eventually compute a sum of passed Ints !!! IGNORED !!! - Scenario: addNow will immediately compute a sum of passed Ints !!! IGNORED !!!
Note that marking a test class as ignored won't prevent it from being discovered by ScalaTest. Ignored classes
will be discovered and run, and all their tests will be reported as ignored. This is intended to keep the ignored
class visible, to encourage the developers to eventually fix and “un-ignore” it. If you want to
prevent a class from being discovered at all (on the JVM, not Scala.js), use the DoNotDiscover
annotation instead.
If you want to ignore all tests of a suite on Scala.js, where annotations can't be inspected at runtime, you'll need
to change it to ignore at each test site. To make a suite non-discoverable on Scala.js, ensure it
does not declare a public no-arg constructor. You can either declare a public constructor that takes one or more
arguments, or make the no-arg constructor non-public. Because this technique will also make the suite non-discoverable
on the JVM, it is a good approach for suites you want to run (but not be discoverable) on both Scala.js and the JVM.
One of the parameters to AsyncFeatureSpec's run method is a Reporter, which
will collect and report information about the running suite of tests.
Information about suites and tests that were run, whether tests succeeded or failed,
and tests that were ignored will be passed to the Reporter as the suite runs.
Most often the default reporting done by AsyncFeatureSpec's methods will be sufficient, but
occasionally you may wish to provide custom information to the Reporter from a test.
For this purpose, an Informer that will forward information to the current Reporter
is provided via the info parameterless method.
You can pass the extra information to the Informer via its apply method.
The Informer will then pass the information to the Reporter via an InfoProvided event.
One use case for the Informer is to pass more information about a scenario to the reporter. For example,
the GivenWhenThen trait provides methods that use the implicit info provided by AsyncFeatureSpec
to pass such information to the reporter. You can see this in action in the initial example of this trait's documentation.
AsyncFeatureSpec also provides a markup method that returns a Documenter, which allows you to send
to the Reporter text formatted in Markdown syntax.
You can pass the extra information to the Documenter via its apply method.
The Documenter will then pass the information to the Reporter via an MarkupProvided event.
Here's an example FlatSpec that uses markup:
package org.scalatest.examples.asyncfeaturespec.markup
import collection.mutable
import org.scalatest._
class SetSpec extends featurespec.AsyncFeatureSpec with GivenWhenThen {
markup { """
Mutable Set
-----------
A set is a collection that contains no duplicate elements.
To implement a concrete mutable set, you need to provide implementations
of the following methods:
def contains(elem: A): Boolean
def iterator: Iterator[A]
def += (elem: A): this.type
def -= (elem: A): this.type
If you wish that methods like `take`,
`drop`, `filter` return the same kind of set,
you should also override:
def empty: This
It is also good idea to override methods `foreach` and
`size` for efficiency.
""" }
Feature("An element can be added to an empty mutable Set") {
Scenario("When an element is added to an empty mutable Set") {
Given("an empty mutable Set")
val set = mutable.Set.empty[String]
When("an element is added")
set += "clarity"
Then("the Set should have size 1")
assert(set.size === 1)
And("the Set should contain the added element")
assert(set.contains("clarity"))
markup("This test finished with a **bold** statement!")
succeed
}
}
}
Although all of ScalaTest's built-in reporters will display the markup text in some form,
the HTML reporter will format the markup information into HTML. Thus, the main purpose of markup is to
add nicely formatted text to HTML reports. Here's what the above SetSpec would look like in the HTML reporter:
ScalaTest records text passed to info and markup during tests, and sends the recorded text in the recordedEvents field of
test completion events like TestSucceeded and TestFailed. This allows string reporters (like the standard out reporter) to show
info and markup text after the test name in a color determined by the outcome of the test. For example, if the test fails, string
reporters will show the info and markup text in red. If a test succeeds, string reporters will show the info
and markup text in green. While this approach helps the readability of reports, it means that you can't use info to get status
updates from long running tests.
To get immediate (i.e., non-recorded) notifications from tests, you can use note (a Notifier) and alert
(an Alerter). Here's an example showing the differences:
package org.scalatest.examples.asyncfeaturespec.note
import collection.mutable
import org.scalatest._
class SetSpec extends featurespec.AsyncFeatureSpec {
Feature("An element can be added to an empty mutable Set") {
Scenario("When an element is added to an empty mutable Set") {
info("info is recorded")
markup("markup is *also* recorded")
note("notes are sent immediately")
alert("alerts are also sent immediately")
val set = mutable.Set.empty[String]
set += "clarity"
assert(set.size === 1)
assert(set.contains("clarity"))
}
}
}
Because note and alert information is sent immediately, it will appear before the test name in string reporters, and its color will
be unrelated to the ultimate outcome of the test: note text will always appear in green, alert text will always appear in yellow.
Here's an example:
scala> org.scalatest.run(new SetSpec) SetSpec: Feature: An element can be added to an empty mutable Set + notes are sent immediately + alerts are also sent immediately Scenario: When an element is added to an empty mutable Set info is recorded + markup is *also* recorded
Another example is slowpoke notifications.
If you find a test is taking a long time to complete, but you're not sure which test, you can enable
slowpoke notifications. ScalaTest will use an Alerter to fire an event whenever a test has been running
longer than a specified amount of time.
In summary, use info and markup for text that should form part of the specification output. Use
note and alert to send status notifications. (Because the HTML reporter is intended to produce a
readable, printable specification, info and markup text will appear in the HTML report, but
note and alert text will not.)
A pending test is one that has been given a name but is not yet implemented. The purpose of pending tests is to facilitate a style of testing in which documentation of behavior is sketched out before tests are written to verify that behavior (and often, before the behavior of the system being tested is itself implemented). Such sketches form a kind of specification of what tests and functionality to implement later.
To support this style of testing, a test can be given a name that specifies one
bit of behavior required by the system being tested. At the end of the test,
it can call method pending, which will cause it to complete abruptly with TestPendingException.
Because tests in ScalaTest can be designated as pending with TestPendingException, both the test name and any information
sent to the reporter when running the test can appear in the report of a test run. (In other words,
the code of a pending test is executed just like any other test.) However, because the test completes abruptly
with TestPendingException, the test will be reported as pending, to indicate
the actual test, and possibly the functionality, has not yet been implemented. Here's an example:
package org.scalatest.examples.asyncfeaturespec.pending
import org.scalatest.featurespec.AsyncFeatureSpec
import scala.concurrent.Future
class AddSpec extends AsyncFeatureSpec {
def addSoon(addends: Int*): Future[Int] = Future { addends.sum }
def addNow(addends: Int*): Int = addends.sum
Feature("The add methods") {
Scenario("addSoon will eventually compute a sum of passed Ints") (pending)
Scenario("addNow will immediately compute a sum of passed Ints") {
val sum: Int = addNow(1, 2)
// You can also write synchronous tests. The body
// must have result type Assertion:
assert(sum == 3)
}
}
}
(Note: "(pending)" is the body of the test. Thus the test contains just one statement, an invocation
of the pending method, which throws TestPendingException.)
If you run this version of AddSpec with:
scala> org.scalatest.run(new AddSpec)
It will run both tests, but report that first test is pending. You'll see:
AddSpec: Feature: The add methods - Scenario: addSoon will eventually compute a sum of passed Ints (pending) - Scenario: addNow will immediately compute a sum of passed Ints
One difference between an ignored test and a pending one is that an ignored test is intended to be used during significant refactorings of the code under test, when tests break and you don't want to spend the time to fix all of them immediately. You can mark some of those broken tests as ignored temporarily, so that you can focus the red bar on just failing tests you actually want to fix immediately. Later you can go back and fix the ignored tests. In other words, by ignoring some failing tests temporarily, you can more easily notice failed tests that you actually want to fix. By contrast, a pending test is intended to be used before a test and/or the code under test is written. Pending indicates you've decided to write a test for a bit of behavior, but either you haven't written the test yet, or have only written part of it, or perhaps you've written the test but don't want to implement the behavior it tests until after you've implemented a different bit of behavior you realized you need first. Thus ignored tests are designed to facilitate refactoring of existing code whereas pending tests are designed to facilitate the creation of new code.
One other difference between ignored and pending tests is that ignored tests are implemented as a test tag that is
excluded by default. Thus an ignored test is never executed. By contrast, a pending test is implemented as a
test that throws TestPendingException (which is what calling the pending method does). Thus
the body of pending tests are executed up until they throw TestPendingException.
An AsyncFeatureSpec's tests may be classified into groups by tagging them with string names.
As with any suite, when executing an AsyncFeatureSpec, groups of tests can
optionally be included and/or excluded. To tag an AsyncFeatureSpec's tests,
you pass objects that extend class org.scalatest.Tag to methods
that register tests. Class Tag takes one parameter, a string name. If you have
created tag annotation interfaces as described in the Tag documentation, then you
will probably want to use tag names on your test functions that match. To do so, simply
pass the fully qualified names of the tag interfaces to the Tag constructor. For example, if you've
defined a tag annotation interface with fully qualified name,
com.mycompany.tags.DbTest, then you could
create a matching tag for AsyncFeatureSpecs like this:
package org.scalatest.examples.asyncfeaturespec.tagging
import org.scalatest.Tag
object DbTest extends Tag("com.mycompany.tags.DbTest")
Given these definitions, you could place AsyncFeatureSpec tests into groups with tags like this:
import org.scalatest.featurespec.AsyncFeatureSpec
import org.scalatest.tagobjects.Slow
import scala.concurrent.Future
class AddSpec extends AsyncFeatureSpec {
def addSoon(addends: Int*): Future[Int] = Future { addends.sum }
def addNow(addends: Int*): Int = addends.sum
Feature("The add methods") {
Scenario("addSoon will eventually compute a sum of passed Ints",
Slow) {
val futureSum: Future[Int] = addSoon(1, 2)
// You can map assertions onto a Future, then return
// the resulting Future[Assertion] to ScalaTest:
futureSum map { sum => assert(sum == 3) }
}
Scenario("addNow will immediately compute a sum of passed Ints",
Slow, DbTest) {
val sum: Int = addNow(1, 2)
// You can also write synchronous tests. The body
// must have result type Assertion:
assert(sum == 3)
}
}
}
This code marks both tests with the org.scalatest.tags.Slow tag,
and the second test with the com.mycompany.tags.DbTest tag.
The run method takes a Filter, whose constructor takes an optional
Set[String] called tagsToInclude and a Set[String] called
tagsToExclude. If tagsToInclude is None, all tests will be run
except those those belonging to tags listed in the
tagsToExclude Set. If tagsToInclude is defined, only tests
belonging to tags mentioned in the tagsToInclude set, and not mentioned in tagsToExclude,
will be run.
It is recommended, though not required, that you create a corresponding tag annotation when you
create a Tag object. A tag annotation (on the JVM, not Scala.js) allows you to tag all the tests of an AsyncFeatureSpec in
one stroke by annotating the class. For more information and examples, see the
documentation for class Tag. On Scala.js, to tag all tests of a suite, you'll need to
tag each test individually at the test site.
== Shared fixtures ==
A test fixture is composed of the objects and other artifacts (files, sockets, database connections, etc.) tests use to do their work. When multiple tests need to work with the same fixtures, it is important to try and avoid duplicating the fixture code across those tests. The more code duplication you have in your tests, the greater drag the tests will have on refactoring the actual production code.
ScalaTest recommends three techniques to eliminate such code duplication in async styles:
-
Refactor using Scala
-
Override
withFixture -
Mix in a before-and-after trait
Each technique is geared towards helping you reduce code duplication without introducing
instance vars, shared mutable objects, or other dependencies between tests. Eliminating shared
mutable state across tests will make your test code easier to reason about and eliminate the need to
synchronize access to shared mutable state on the JVM.
The following sections describe these techniques, including explaining the recommended usage for each. But first, here's a table summarizing the options:
| Refactor using Scala when different tests need different fixtures. | |
| get-fixture methods | The extract method refactor helps you create a fresh instances of mutable fixture objects in each test that needs them, but doesn't help you clean them up when you're done. |
| loan-fixture methods | Factor out dupicate code with the loan pattern when different tests need different fixtures that must be cleaned up afterwards. |
Override withFixture when most or all tests need the same fixture.
|
|
withFixture(NoArgAsyncTest)
|
The recommended default approach when most or all tests need the same fixture treatment. This general technique allows you, for example, to perform side effects at the beginning and end of all or most tests, transform the outcome of tests, retry tests, make decisions based on test names, tags, or other test data. Use this technique unless:
|
withFixture(OneArgAsyncTest)
|
Use when you want to pass the same fixture object or objects as a parameter into all or most tests. |
| Mix in a before-and-after trait when you want an aborted suite, not a failed test, if the fixture code fails. | |
BeforeAndAfter
|
Use this boilerplate-buster when you need to perform the same side-effects before and/or after tests, rather than at the beginning or end of tests. |
BeforeAndAfterEach
|
Use when you want to stack traits that perform the same side-effects before and/or after tests, rather than at the beginning or end of tests. |
==== Calling get-fixture methods ====
If you need to create the same mutable fixture objects in multiple tests, and don't need to clean them up after using them, the simplest approach is to write one or more get-fixture methods. A get-fixture method returns a new instance of a needed fixture object (or a holder object containing multiple fixture objects) each time it is called. You can call a get-fixture method at the beginning of each test that needs the fixture, storing the returned object or objects in local variables. Here's an example:
package org.scalatest.examples.asyncfeaturespec.getfixture
import org.scalatest.featurespec.AsyncFeatureSpec
import scala.concurrent.Future
class ExampleSpec extends AsyncFeatureSpec {
def fixture: Future[String] = Future { "ScalaTest is designed to " }
Feature("Simplicity") {
Scenario("User needs to read test code written by others") {
val future = fixture
val result = future map { s => s + "encourage clear code!" }
result map { s =>
assert(s == "ScalaTest is designed to encourage clear code!")
}
}
Scenario("User needs to understand what the tests are doing") {
val future = fixture
val result = future map { s => s + "be easy to reason about!" }
result map { s =>
assert(s == "ScalaTest is designed to be easy to reason about!")
}
}
}
}
If you need to configure fixture objects differently in different tests, you can pass configuration into the get-fixture method. For example, you could pass in an initial value for a fixture object as a parameter to the get-fixture method.
==== Overriding withFixture(NoArgAsyncTest) ====
Although the get-fixture method approach takes care of setting up a fixture at the beginning of each
test, it doesn't address the problem of cleaning up a fixture at the end of the test. If you just need to perform a side-effect at the beginning or end of
a test, and don't need to actually pass any fixture objects into the test, you can override withFixture(NoArgAsyncTest), a
method defined in trait AsyncTestSuite, a supertrait of AsyncFeatureSpec.
Trait AsyncFeatureSpec's runTest method passes a no-arg async test function to
withFixture(NoArgAsyncTest). It is withFixture's
responsibility to invoke that test function. The default implementation of withFixture simply
invokes the function and returns the result, like this:
// Default implementation in trait AsyncTestSuite
protected def withFixture(test: NoArgAsyncTest): FutureOutcome = {
test()
}
You can, therefore, override withFixture to perform setup before invoking the test function,
and/or perform cleanup after the test completes. The recommended way to ensure cleanup is performed after a test completes is
to use the complete-lastly syntax, defined in supertrait CompleteLastly.
The complete-lastly syntax will ensure that
cleanup will occur whether future-producing code completes abruptly by throwing an exception, or returns
normally yielding a future. In the latter case, complete-lastly will register the cleanup code
to execute asynchronously when the future completes.
The withFixture method is designed to be stacked, and to enable this, you should always call the super implementation
of withFixture, and let it invoke the test function rather than invoking the test function directly. In other words, instead of writing
“test()”, you should write “super.withFixture(test)”, like this:
// Your implementation
override def withFixture(test: NoArgTest) = {
// Perform setup here
complete {
super.withFixture(test) // Invoke the test function
} lastly {
// Perform cleanup here
}
}
If you have no cleanup to perform, you can write withFixture like this instead:
// Your implementation
override def withFixture(test: NoArgTest) = {
// Perform setup here
super.withFixture(test) // Invoke the test function
}
If you want to perform an action only for certain outcomes, you'll need to
register code performing that action as a callback on the Future using
one of Future's registration methods: onComplete, onSuccess,
or onFailure. Note that if a test fails, that will be treated as a
scala.util.Success(org.scalatest.Failed). So if you want to perform an
action if a test fails, for example, you'd register the callback using onSuccess.
Here's an example in which withFixture(NoArgAsyncTest) is used to take a
snapshot of the working directory if a test fails, and
send that information to the standard output stream:
package org.scalatest.examples.asyncfeaturespec.noargasynctest
import java.io.File
import org.scalatest._
import scala.concurrent.Future
class ExampleSpec extends featurespec.AsyncFeatureSpec {
override def withFixture(test: NoArgAsyncTest) = {
super.withFixture(test) onFailedThen { _ =>
val currDir = new File(".")
val fileNames = currDir.list()
info("Dir snapshot: " + fileNames.mkString(", "))
}
}
def addSoon(addends: Int*): Future[Int] = Future { addends.sum }
Feature("addSoon") {
Scenario("succeed case") {
addSoon(1, 1) map { sum => assert(sum == 2) }
}
Scenario("fail case") {
addSoon(1, 1) map { sum => assert(sum == 3) }
}
}
}
Running this version of ExampleSpec in the interpreter in a directory with two files, hello.txt and world.txt
would give the following output:
scala> org.scalatest.run(new ExampleSpec) ExampleSpec: Feature: addSoon - Scenario: succeed case - Scenario: fail case *** FAILED *** 2 did not equal 3 (:33)
Note that the NoArgAsyncTest passed to withFixture, in addition to
an apply method that executes the test, also includes the test name and the config
map passed to runTest. Thus you can also use the test name and configuration objects in your withFixture
implementation.
Lastly, if you want to transform the outcome in some way in withFixture, you'll need to use either the
map or transform methods of Future, like this:
// Your implementation
override def withFixture(test: NoArgAsyncTest) = {
// Perform setup here
val futureOutcome = super.withFixture(test) // Invoke the test function
futureOutcome change { outcome =>
// transform the outcome into a new outcome here
}
}
Note that a NoArgAsyncTest's apply method will return a scala.util.Failure only if
the test completes abruptly with a "test-fatal" exception (such as OutOfMemoryError) that should
cause the suite to abort rather than the test to fail. Thus usually you would use map
to transform future outcomes, not transform, so that such test-fatal exceptions pass through
unchanged. The suite will abort asynchronously with any exception returned from NoArgAsyncTest's
apply method in a scala.util.Failure.
==== Calling loan-fixture methods ====
If you need to both pass a fixture object into a test and perform cleanup at the end of the test, you'll need to use the loan pattern. If different tests need different fixtures that require cleanup, you can implement the loan pattern directly by writing loan-fixture methods. A loan-fixture method takes a function whose body forms part or all of a test's code. It creates a fixture, passes it to the test code by invoking the function, then cleans up the fixture after the function returns.
The following example shows three tests that use two fixtures, a database and a file. Both require cleanup after, so each is provided via a
loan-fixture method. (In this example, the database is simulated with a StringBuffer.)
package org.scalatest.examples.asyncfeaturespec.loanfixture
import java.util.concurrent.ConcurrentHashMap
import scala.concurrent.Future
import scala.concurrent.ExecutionContext
object DbServer { // Simulating a database server
type Db = StringBuffer
private final val databases = new ConcurrentHashMap[String, Db]
def createDb(name: String): Db = {
val db = new StringBuffer // java.lang.StringBuffer is thread-safe
databases.put(name, db)
db
}
def removeDb(name: String): Unit = {
databases.remove(name)
}
}
// Defining actor messages
sealed abstract class StringOp
case object Clear extends StringOp
case class Append(value: String) extends StringOp
case object GetValue
class StringActor { // Simulating an actor
private final val sb = new StringBuilder
def !(op: StringOp): Unit =
synchronized {
op match {
case Append(value) => sb.append(value)
case Clear => sb.clear()
}
}
def ?(get: GetValue.type)(implicit c: ExecutionContext): Future[String] =
Future {
synchronized { sb.toString }
}
}
import org.scalatest._
import DbServer._
import java.util.UUID.randomUUID
class ExampleSpec extends featurespec.AsyncFeatureSpec {
def withDatabase(testCode: Future[Db] => Future[Assertion]) = {
val dbName = randomUUID.toString // generate a unique db name
val futureDb = Future { createDb(dbName) } // create the fixture
complete {
val futurePopulatedDb =
futureDb map { db =>
db.append("ScalaTest is designed to ") // perform setup
}
testCode(futurePopulatedDb) // "loan" the fixture to the test code
} lastly {
removeDb(dbName) // ensure the fixture will be cleaned up
}
}
def withActor(testCode: StringActor => Future[Assertion]) = {
val actor = new StringActor
complete {
actor ! Append("ScalaTest is designed to ") // set up the fixture
testCode(actor) // "loan" the fixture to the test code
} lastly {
actor ! Clear // ensure the fixture will be cleaned up
}
}
Feature("Simplicity") {
// This test needs the actor fixture
Scenario("User needs to read test code written by others") {
withActor { actor =>
actor ! Append("encourage clear code!")
val futureString = actor ? GetValue
futureString map { s =>
assert(s === "ScalaTest is designed to encourage clear code!")
}
}
}
// This test needs the database fixture
Scenario("User needs to understand what the tests are doing") {
withDatabase { futureDb =>
futureDb map { db =>
db.append("be easy to reason about!")
assert(db.toString === "ScalaTest is designed to be easy to reason about!")
}
}
}
// This test needs both the actor and the database
Scenario("User needs to write tests") {
withDatabase { futureDb =>
withActor { actor => // loan-fixture methods compose
actor ! Append("be easy to remember how to write!")
val futureString = actor ? GetValue
val futurePair: Future[(Db, String)] =
futureDb zip futureString
futurePair map { case (db, s) =>
db.append("be easy to learn!")
assert(db.toString === "ScalaTest is designed to be easy to learn!")
assert(s === "ScalaTest is designed to be easy to remember how to write!")
}
}
}
}
}
}
As demonstrated by the last test, loan-fixture methods compose. Not only do loan-fixture methods allow you to give each test the fixture it needs, they allow you to give a test multiple fixtures and clean everything up afterwards.
Also demonstrated in this example is the technique of giving each test its own "fixture sandbox" to play in. When your fixtures involve external side-effects, like creating databases, it is a good idea to give each database a unique name as is done in this example. This keeps tests completely isolated, allowing you to run them in parallel if desired.
==== Overriding withFixture(OneArgTest) ====
If all or most tests need the same fixture, you can avoid some of the boilerplate of the loan-fixture method approach by using a
FixtureAsyncTestSuite and overriding withFixture(OneArgAsyncTest).
Each test in a FixtureAsyncTestSuite takes a fixture as a parameter, allowing you to pass the fixture into
the test. You must indicate the type of the fixture parameter by specifying FixtureParam, and implement a
withFixture method that takes a OneArgAsyncTest. This withFixture method is responsible for
invoking the one-arg async test function, so you can perform fixture set up before invoking and passing
the fixture into the test function, and ensure clean up is performed after the test completes.
To enable the stacking of traits that define withFixture(NoArgAsyncTest), it is a good idea to let
withFixture(NoArgAsyncTest) invoke the test function instead of invoking the test
function directly. To do so, you'll need to convert the OneArgAsyncTest to a NoArgAsyncTest. You can do that by passing
the fixture object to the toNoArgAsyncTest method of OneArgAsyncTest. In other words, instead of
writing “test(theFixture)”, you'd delegate responsibility for
invoking the test function to the withFixture(NoArgAsyncTest) method of the same instance by writing:
withFixture(test.toNoArgAsyncTest(theFixture))
Here's a complete example:
package org.scalatest.examples.asyncfeaturespec.oneargasynctest
import org.scalatest._
import scala.concurrent.Future
import scala.concurrent.ExecutionContext
// Defining actor messages
sealed abstract class StringOp
case object Clear extends StringOp
case class Append(value: String) extends StringOp
case object GetValue
class StringActor { // Simulating an actor
private final val sb = new StringBuilder
def !(op: StringOp): Unit =
synchronized {
op match {
case Append(value) => sb.append(value)
case Clear => sb.clear()
}
}
def ?(get: GetValue.type)(implicit c: ExecutionContext): Future[String] =
Future {
synchronized { sb.toString }
}
}
class ExampleSpec extends featurespec.FixtureAsyncFeatureSpec {
type FixtureParam = StringActor
def withFixture(test: OneArgAsyncTest): FutureOutcome = {
val actor = new StringActor
complete {
actor ! Append("ScalaTest is designed to ") // set up the fixture
withFixture(test.toNoArgAsyncTest(actor))
} lastly {
actor ! Clear // ensure the fixture will be cleaned up
}
}
Feature("Simplicity") {
Scenario("User needs to read test code written by others") { actor =>
actor ! Append("encourage clear code!")
val futureString = actor ? GetValue
futureString map { s =>
assert(s === "ScalaTest is designed to encourage clear code!")
}
}
Scenario("User needs to understand what the tests are doing") { actor =>
actor ! Append("be easy to reason about!")
val futureString = actor ? GetValue
futureString map { s =>
assert(s === "ScalaTest is designed to be easy to reason about!")
}
}
}
}
In this example, the tests required one fixture object, a StringActor. If your tests need multiple fixture objects, you can
simply define the FixtureParam type to be a tuple containing the objects or, alternatively, a case class containing
the objects. For more information on the withFixture(OneArgAsyncTest) technique, see
the documentation for FixtureAsyncFeatureSpec.
==== Mixing in BeforeAndAfter ====
In all the shared fixture examples shown so far, the activities of creating, setting up, and cleaning up the fixture objects have been
performed during the test. This means that if an exception occurs during any of these activities, it will be reported as a test failure.
Sometimes, however, you may want setup to happen before the test starts, and cleanup after the test has completed, so that if an
exception occurs during setup or cleanup, the entire suite aborts and no more tests are attempted. The simplest way to accomplish this in ScalaTest is
to mix in trait BeforeAndAfter. With this trait you can denote a bit of code to run before each test
with before and/or after each test each test with after, like this:
package org.scalatest.examples.asyncfeaturespec.beforeandafter
import org.scalatest.featurespec.AsyncFeatureSpec
import org.scalatest.BeforeAndAfter
import scala.concurrent.Future
import scala.concurrent.ExecutionContext
// Defining actor messages
sealed abstract class StringOp
case object Clear extends StringOp
case class Append(value: String) extends StringOp
case object GetValue
class StringActor { // Simulating an actor
private final val sb = new StringBuilder
def !(op: StringOp): Unit =
synchronized {
op match {
case Append(value) => sb.append(value)
case Clear => sb.clear()
}
}
def ?(get: GetValue.type)(implicit c: ExecutionContext): Future[String] =
Future {
synchronized { sb.toString }
}
}
class ExampleSpec extends AsyncFeatureSpec with BeforeAndAfter {
final val actor = new StringActor
before {
actor ! Append("ScalaTest is designed to ") // set up the fixture
}
after {
actor ! Clear // clean up the fixture
}
Feature("Simplicity") {
Scenario("User needs to read test code written by others") {
actor ! Append("encourage clear code!")
val futureString = actor ? GetValue
futureString map { s =>
assert(s == "ScalaTest is designed to encourage clear code!")
}
}
Scenario("User needs to understand what the tests are doing") {
actor ! Append("be easy to reason about!")
val futureString = actor ? GetValue
futureString map { s =>
assert(s == "ScalaTest is designed to be easy to reason about!")
}
}
}
}
Note that the only way before and after code can communicate with test code is via some
side-effecting mechanism, commonly by reassigning instance vars or by changing the state of mutable
objects held from instance vals (as in this example). If using instance vars or
mutable objects held from instance vals you wouldn't be able to run tests in parallel in the same instance
of the test class (on the JVM, not Scala.js) unless you synchronized access to the shared, mutable state.
Note that on the JVM, if you override ScalaTest's default
serial execution context, you will likely need to
worry about synchronizing access to shared mutable fixture state, because the execution
context may assign different threads to process
different Future transformations. Although access to mutable state along
the same linear chain of Future transformations need not be synchronized,
it can be difficult to spot cases where these constraints are violated. The best approach
is to use only immutable objects when transforming Futures. When that's not
practical, involve only thread-safe mutable objects, as is done in the above example.
On Scala.js, by contrast, you need not worry about thread synchronization, because
in effect only one thread exists.
Although BeforeAndAfter provides a minimal-boilerplate way to execute code before and after tests, it isn't designed to enable stackable
traits, because the order of execution would be non-obvious. If you want to factor out before and after code that is common to multiple test suites, you
should use trait BeforeAndAfterEach instead, as shown later in the next section,
composing fixtures by stacking traits.
== Composing fixtures by stacking traits ==
In larger projects, teams often end up with several different fixtures that test classes need in different combinations,
and possibly initialized (and cleaned up) in different orders. A good way to accomplish this in ScalaTest is to factor the individual
fixtures into traits that can be composed using the stackable trait pattern. This can be done, for example, by placing
withFixture methods in several traits, each of which call super.withFixture. Here's an example in
which the StringBuilderActor and StringBufferActor fixtures used in the previous examples have been
factored out into two stackable fixture traits named Builder and Buffer:
package org.scalatest.examples.asyncfeaturespec.composingwithasyncfixture
import org.scalatest._
import org.scalatest.SuiteMixin
import collection.mutable.ListBuffer
import scala.concurrent.Future
import scala.concurrent.ExecutionContext
// Defining actor messages
sealed abstract class StringOp
case object Clear extends StringOp
case class Append(value: String) extends StringOp
case object GetValue
class StringBuilderActor { // Simulating an actor
private final val sb = new StringBuilder
def !(op: StringOp): Unit =
synchronized {
op match {
case Append(value) => sb.append(value)
case Clear => sb.clear()
}
}
def ?(get: GetValue.type)(implicit c: ExecutionContext): Future[String] =
Future {
synchronized { sb.toString }
}
}
class StringBufferActor {
private final val buf = ListBuffer.empty[String]
def !(op: StringOp): Unit =
synchronized {
op match {
case Append(value) => buf += value
case Clear => buf.clear()
}
}
def ?(get: GetValue.type)(implicit c: ExecutionContext): Future[List[String]] =
Future {
synchronized { buf.toList }
}
}
trait Builder extends AsyncTestSuiteMixin { this: AsyncTestSuite =>
final val builderActor = new StringBuilderActor
abstract override def withFixture(test: NoArgAsyncTest) = {
builderActor ! Append("ScalaTest is designed to ")
complete {
super.withFixture(test) // To be stackable, must call super.withFixture
} lastly {
builderActor ! Clear
}
}
}
trait Buffer extends AsyncTestSuiteMixin { this: AsyncTestSuite =>
final val bufferActor = new StringBufferActor
abstract override def withFixture(test: NoArgAsyncTest) = {
complete {
super.withFixture(test) // To be stackable, must call super.withFixture
} lastly {
bufferActor ! Clear
}
}
}
class ExampleSpec extends AsyncFeatureSpec with Builder with Buffer {
Feature("Simplicity") {
Scenario("User needs to read test code written by others") {
builderActor ! Append("encourage clear code!")
val futureString = builderActor ? GetValue
val futureList = bufferActor ? GetValue
val futurePair: Future[(String, List[String])] = futureString zip futureList
futurePair map { case (str, lst) =>
assert(str == "ScalaTest is designed to encourage clear code!")
assert(lst.isEmpty)
bufferActor ! Append("sweet")
succeed
}
}
Scenario("User needs to understand what the tests are doing") {
builderActor ! Append("be easy to reason about!")
val futureString = builderActor ? GetValue
val futureList = bufferActor ? GetValue
val futurePair: Future[(String, List[String])] = futureString zip futureList
futurePair map { case (str, lst) =>
assert(str == "ScalaTest is designed to be easy to reason about!")
assert(lst.isEmpty)
bufferActor ! Append("awesome")
succeed
}
}
}
}
By mixing in both the Builder and Buffer traits, ExampleSpec gets both fixtures, which will be
initialized before each test and cleaned up after. The order the traits are mixed together determines the order of execution.
In this case, Builder is “super” to Buffer. If you wanted Buffer to be “super”
to Builder, you need only switch the order you mix them together, like this:
class Example2Spec extends AsyncFeatureSpec with Buffer with Builder
If you only need one fixture you mix in only that trait:
class Example3Spec extends AsyncFeatureSpec with Builder
Another way to create stackable fixture traits is by extending the BeforeAndAfterEach
and/or BeforeAndAfterAll traits.
BeforeAndAfterEach has a beforeEach method that will be run before each test (like JUnit's setUp),
and an afterEach method that will be run after (like JUnit's tearDown).
Similarly, BeforeAndAfterAll has a beforeAll method that will be run before all tests,
and an afterAll method that will be run after all tests. Here's what the previously shown example would look like if it
were rewritten to use the BeforeAndAfterEach methods instead of withFixture:
package org.scalatest.examples.asyncfeaturespec.composingbeforeandaftereach
import org.scalatest._
import org.scalatest.BeforeAndAfterEach
import collection.mutable.ListBuffer
import scala.concurrent.Future
import scala.concurrent.ExecutionContext
// Defining actor messages
sealed abstract class StringOp
case object Clear extends StringOp
case class Append(value: String) extends StringOp
case object GetValue
class StringBuilderActor { // Simulating an actor
private final val sb = new StringBuilder
def !(op: StringOp): Unit =
synchronized {
op match {
case Append(value) => sb.append(value)
case Clear => sb.clear()
}
}
def ?(get: GetValue.type)(implicit c: ExecutionContext): Future[String] =
Future {
synchronized { sb.toString }
}
}
class StringBufferActor {
private final val buf = ListBuffer.empty[String]
def !(op: StringOp): Unit =
synchronized {
op match {
case Append(value) => buf += value
case Clear => buf.clear()
}
}
def ?(get: GetValue.type)(implicit c: ExecutionContext): Future[List[String]] =
Future {
synchronized { buf.toList }
}
}
trait Builder extends BeforeAndAfterEach { this: Suite =>
final val builderActor = new StringBuilderActor
override def beforeEach() {
builderActor ! Append("ScalaTest is designed to ")
super.beforeEach() // To be stackable, must call super.beforeEach
}
override def afterEach() {
try super.afterEach() // To be stackable, must call super.afterEach
finally builderActor ! Clear
}
}
trait Buffer extends BeforeAndAfterEach { this: Suite =>
final val bufferActor = new StringBufferActor
override def afterEach() {
try super.afterEach() // To be stackable, must call super.afterEach
finally bufferActor ! Clear
}
}
class ExampleSpec extends featurespec.AsyncFeatureSpec with Builder with Buffer {
Feature("Simplicity") {
Scenario("User needs to read test code written by others") {
builderActor ! Append("encourage clear code!")
val futureString = builderActor ? GetValue
val futureList = bufferActor ? GetValue
val futurePair: Future[(String, List[String])] = futureString zip futureList
futurePair map { case (str, lst) =>
assert(str == "ScalaTest is designed to encourage clear code!")
assert(lst.isEmpty)
bufferActor ! Append("sweet")
succeed
}
}
Scenario("User needs to understand what the tests are doing") {
builderActor ! Append("be easy to reason about!")
val futureString = builderActor ? GetValue
val futureList = bufferActor ? GetValue
val futurePair: Future[(String, List[String])] = futureString zip futureList
futurePair map { case (str, lst) =>
assert(str == "ScalaTest is designed to be easy to reason about!")
assert(lst.isEmpty)
bufferActor ! Append("awesome")
succeed
}
}
}
}
To get the same ordering as withFixture, place your super.beforeEach call at the end of each
beforeEach method, and the super.afterEach call at the beginning of each afterEach
method, as shown in the previous example. It is a good idea to invoke super.afterEach in a try
block and perform cleanup in a finally clause, as shown in the previous example, because this ensures the
cleanup code is performed even if super.afterEach throws an exception.
The difference between stacking traits that extend BeforeAndAfterEach versus traits that implement withFixture is
that setup and cleanup code happens before and after the test in BeforeAndAfterEach, but at the beginning and
end of the test in withFixture. Thus if a withFixture method completes abruptly with an exception, it is
considered a failed test. By contrast, if any of the beforeEach or afterEach methods of BeforeAndAfterEach
complete abruptly, it is considered an aborted suite, which will result in a SuiteAborted event.
Sometimes you may want to run the same test code on different fixture objects. In other words, you may want to write tests that are "shared"
by different fixture objects.
To accomplish this in an AsyncFeatureSpec, you first place shared tests in
behavior functions. These behavior functions will be
invoked during the construction phase of any AsyncFeatureSpec that uses them, so that the tests they contain will
be registered as tests in that AsyncFeatureSpec.
For example, given this StackActor class:
package org.scalatest.examples.asyncfeaturespec.sharedtests
import scala.collection.mutable.ListBuffer
import scala.concurrent.Future
import scala.concurrent.ExecutionContext
// Stack operations
case class Push[T](value: T)
sealed abstract class StackOp
case object Pop extends StackOp
case object Peek extends StackOp
case object Size extends StackOp
// Stack info
case class StackInfo[T](top: Option[T], size: Int, max: Int) {
require(size >= 0, "size was less than zero")
require(max >= size, "max was less than size")
val isFull: Boolean = size == max
val isEmpty: Boolean = size == 0
}
class StackActor[T](Max: Int, name: String) {
private final val buf = new ListBuffer[T]
def !(push: Push[T]): Unit =
synchronized {
if (buf.size != Max)
buf.prepend(push.value)
else
throw new IllegalStateException("can't push onto a full stack")
}
def ?(op: StackOp)(implicit c: ExecutionContext): Future[StackInfo[T]] =
synchronized {
op match {
case Pop =>
Future {
if (buf.size != 0)
StackInfo(Some(buf.remove(0)), buf.size, Max)
else
throw new IllegalStateException("can't pop an empty stack")
}
case Peek =>
Future {
if (buf.size != 0)
StackInfo(Some(buf(0)), buf.size, Max)
else
throw new IllegalStateException("can't peek an empty stack")
}
case Size =>
Future { StackInfo(None, buf.size, Max) }
}
}
override def toString: String = name
}
You may want to test the stack represented by the StackActor class in different states: empty, full, with one item, with one item less than capacity,
etc. You may find you have several tests that make sense any time the stack is non-empty. Thus you'd ideally want to run
those same tests for three stack fixture objects: a full stack, a stack with a one item, and a stack with one item less than
capacity. With shared tests, you can factor these tests out into a behavior function, into which you pass the
stack fixture to use when running the tests. So in your AsyncFeatureSpec for StackActor, you'd invoke the
behavior function three times, passing in each of the three stack fixtures so that the shared tests are run for all three fixtures.
You can define a behavior function that encapsulates these shared tests inside the AsyncFeatureSpec that uses them. If they are shared
between different AsyncFeatureSpecs, however, you could also define them in a separate trait that is mixed into
each AsyncFeatureSpec that uses them.
For example, here the nonEmptyStackActor behavior function (in this case, a
behavior method) is defined in a trait along with another
method containing shared tests for non-full stacks:
import org.scalatest.featurespec.AsyncFeatureSpec
trait AsyncFeatureSpecStackBehaviors { this: AsyncFeatureSpec =>
def nonEmptyStackActor(createNonEmptyStackActor: => StackActor[Int],
lastItemAdded: Int, name: String): Unit = {
Scenario("Size is fired at non-empty stack actor: " + name) {
val stackActor = createNonEmptyStackActor
val futureStackInfo = stackActor ? Size
futureStackInfo map { stackInfo =>
assert(!stackInfo.isEmpty)
}
}
Scenario("Peek is fired at non-empty stack actor: " + name) {
val stackActor = createNonEmptyStackActor
val futurePair: Future[(StackInfo[Int], StackInfo[Int])] =
for {
beforePeek <- stackActor ? Size
afterPeek <- stackActor ? Peek
} yield (beforePeek, afterPeek)
futurePair map { case (beforePeek, afterPeek) =>
assert(afterPeek.top == Some(lastItemAdded))
assert(afterPeek.size == beforePeek.size)
}
}
Scenario("Pop is fired at non-empty stack actor: " + name) {
val stackActor = createNonEmptyStackActor
val futurePair: Future[(StackInfo[Int], StackInfo[Int])] =
for {
beforePop <- stackActor ? Size
afterPop <- stackActor ? Pop
} yield (beforePop, afterPop)
futurePair map { case (beforePop, afterPop) =>
assert(afterPop.top == Some(lastItemAdded))
assert(afterPop.size == beforePop.size - 1)
}
}
}
def nonFullStackActor(createNonFullStackActor: => StackActor[Int], name: String): Unit = {
Scenario("Size is fired at non-full stack actor: " + name) {
val stackActor = createNonFullStackActor
val futureStackInfo = stackActor ? Size
futureStackInfo map { stackInfo =>
assert(!stackInfo.isFull)
}
}
Scenario("Push is fired at non-full stack actor: " + name) {
val stackActor = createNonFullStackActor
val futurePair: Future[(StackInfo[Int], StackInfo[Int])] =
for {
beforePush <- stackActor ? Size
afterPush <- { stackActor ! Push(7); stackActor ? Peek }
} yield (beforePush, afterPush)
futurePair map { case (beforePush, afterPush) =>
assert(afterPush.size == beforePush.size + 1)
assert(afterPush.top == Some(7))
}
}
}
}
Given these behavior functions, you could invoke them directly, but AsyncFeatureSpec offers a DSL for the purpose,
which looks like this:
ScenariosFor(nonEmptyStackActor(almostEmptyStackActor, LastValuePushed, almostEmptyStackActorName)) ScenariosFor(nonFullStackActor(almostEmptyStackActor, almostEmptyStackActorName))
Here's an example:
class StackSpec extends AsyncFeatureSpec with AsyncFeatureSpecStackBehaviors {
val Max = 10
val LastValuePushed = Max - 1
// Stack fixture creation methods
val emptyStackActorName = "empty stack actor"
def emptyStackActor = new StackActor[Int](Max, emptyStackActorName )
val fullStackActorName = "full stack actor"
def fullStackActor = {
val stackActor = new StackActor[Int](Max, fullStackActorName )
for (i <- 0 until Max)
stackActor ! Push(i)
stackActor
}
val almostEmptyStackActorName = "almost empty stack actor"
def almostEmptyStackActor = {
val stackActor = new StackActor[Int](Max, almostEmptyStackActorName )
stackActor ! Push(LastValuePushed)
stackActor
}
val almostFullStackActorName = "almost full stack actor"
def almostFullStackActor = {
val stackActor = new StackActor[Int](Max, almostFullStackActorName)
for (i <- 1 to LastValuePushed)
stackActor ! Push(i)
stackActor
}
Feature("A Stack is pushed and popped") {
Scenario("Size is fired at empty stack actor") {
val stackActor = emptyStackActor
val futureStackInfo = stackActor ? Size
futureStackInfo map { stackInfo =>
assert(stackInfo.isEmpty)
}
}
Scenario("Peek is fired at empty stack actor") {
recoverToSucceededIf[IllegalStateException] {
emptyStackActor ? Peek
}
}
Scenario("Pop is fired at empty stack actor") {
recoverToSucceededIf[IllegalStateException] {
emptyStackActor ? Pop
}
}
ScenariosFor(nonEmptyStackActor(almostEmptyStackActor, LastValuePushed, almostEmptyStackActorName))
ScenariosFor(nonFullStackActor(almostEmptyStackActor, almostEmptyStackActorName))
ScenariosFor(nonEmptyStackActor(almostFullStackActor, LastValuePushed, almostFullStackActorName))
ScenariosFor(nonFullStackActor(almostFullStackActor, almostFullStackActorName))
Scenario("full is invoked on a full stack") {
val stackActor = fullStackActor
val futureStackInfo = stackActor ? Size
futureStackInfo map { stackInfo =>
assert(stackInfo.isFull)
}
}
ScenariosFor(nonEmptyStackActor(fullStackActor, LastValuePushed, fullStackActorName))
Scenario("push is invoked on a full stack") {
val stackActor = fullStackActor
assertThrows[IllegalStateException] {
stackActor ! Push(10)
}
}
}
}
If you load these classes into the Scala interpreter (with scalatest's JAR file on the class path), and execute it, you'll see:
scala> org.scalatest.run(new StackSpec)
StackSpec:
Feature: A Stack actor
- Scenario: Size is fired at empty stack actor
- Scenario: Peek is fired at empty stack actor
- Scenario: Pop is fired at empty stack actor
- Scenario: Size is fired at non-empty stack actor: almost empty stack actor
- Scenario: Peek is fired at non-empty stack actor: almost empty stack actor
- Scenario: Pop is fired at non-empty stack actor: almost empty stack actor
- Scenario: Size is fired at non-full stack actor: almost empty stack actor
- Scenario: Push is fired at non-full stack actor: almost empty stack actor
- Scenario: Size is fired at non-empty stack actor: almost full stack actor
- Scenario: Peek is fired at non-empty stack actor: almost full stack actor
- Scenario: Pop is fired at non-empty stack actor: almost full stack actor
- Scenario: Size is fired at non-full stack actor: almost full stack actor
- Scenario: Push is fired at non-full stack actor: almost full stack actor
- Scenario: Size is fired at full stack actor
- Scenario: Size is fired at non-empty stack actor: full stack actor
- Scenario: Peek is fired at non-empty stack actor: full stack actor
- Scenario: Pop is fired at non-empty stack actor: full stack actor
- Scenario: Push is fired at full stack actor
One thing to keep in mind when using shared tests is that in ScalaTest, each test in a suite must have a unique name.
If you register the same tests repeatedly in the same suite, one problem you may encounter is an exception at runtime
complaining that multiple tests are being registered with the same test name.
Although in an AsyncFeatureSpec, the feature clause is a nesting construct analogous to
AsyncFunSpec's describe clause, you many sometimes need to do a bit of
extra work to ensure that the test names are unique. If a duplicate test name problem shows up in an
AsyncFeatureSpec, you'll need to pass in a prefix or suffix string to add to each test name. You can call
toString on the shared fixture object, or pass this string
the same way you pass any other data needed by the shared tests.
This is the approach taken by the previous AsyncFeatureSpecStackBehaviors example.
Given this AsyncFeatureSpecStackBehaviors trait, calling it with the almostEmptyStackActor fixture, like this:
ScenariosFor(nonEmptyStackActor(almostEmptyStackActor, LastValuePushed, almostEmptyStackActorName))
yields test names:
-
Size is fired at non-empty stack actor: almost empty stack actor -
Peek is fired at non-empty stack actor: almost empty stack actor -
Pop is fired at non-empty stack actor: almost empty stack actor
Whereas calling it with the almostFullStackActor fixture, like this:
ScenariosFor(nonEmptyStack(almostFullStackActor, lastValuePushed, almostFullStackActorName))
yields different test names:
-
Size is fired at non-empty stack actor: almost full stack actor -
Peek is fired at non-empty stack actor: almost full stack actor -
Pop is fired at non-empty stack actor: almost full stack actor
Implementation trait for class AsyncFeatureSpec, which represents
a suite of tests in which each test represents one scenario of a
feature.
Implementation trait for class AsyncFeatureSpec, which represents
a suite of tests in which each test represents one scenario of a
feature.
AsyncFeatureSpec is a class, not a
trait, to minimize compile time given there is a slight compiler overhead to
mixing in traits compared to extending classes. If you need to mix the
behavior of AsyncFeatureSpec into some other class, you can use this
trait instead, because class AsyncFeatureSpec does nothing more than
extend this trait and add a nice toString implementation.
See the documentation of the class for a detailed
overview of AsyncFeatureSpec.
A sister class to org.scalatest.featurespec.AnyFeatureSpec that can pass a fixture object into its tests.
A sister class to org.scalatest.featurespec.AnyFeatureSpec that can pass a fixture object into its tests.
Recommended Usage:
Use class FixtureAnyFeatureSpec in situations for which AnyFeatureSpec
would be a good choice, when all or most tests need the same fixture objects
that must be cleaned up afterwards. Note: FixtureAnyFeatureSpec is intended for use in special situations, with class AnyFeatureSpec used for general needs. For
more insight into where FixtureAnyFeatureSpec fits in the big picture, see the withFixture(OneArgTest) subsection of the Shared fixtures section in the documentation for class AnyFeatureSpec.
|
Class FixtureAnyFeatureSpec behaves similarly to class org.scalatest.featurespec.AnyFeatureSpec, except that tests may have a
fixture parameter. The type of the
fixture parameter is defined by the abstract FixtureParam type, which is a member of this class.
This trait also has an abstract withFixture method. This withFixture method
takes a OneArgTest, which is a nested trait defined as a member of this class.
OneArgTest has an apply method that takes a FixtureParam.
This apply method is responsible for running a test.
This class's runTest method delegates the actual running of each test to withFixture(OneArgTest), passing
in the test code to run via the OneArgTest argument. The withFixture(OneArgTest) method (abstract in this class) is responsible
for creating the fixture argument and passing it to the test function.
Subclasses of this class must, therefore, do three things differently from a plain old org.scalatest.featurespec.AnyFeatureSpec:
-
define the type of the fixture parameter by specifying type
FixtureParam -
define the
withFixture(OneArgTest)method -
write tests that take a fixture parameter
-
(You can also define tests that don't take a fixture parameter.)
If the fixture you want to pass into your tests consists of multiple objects, you will need to combine them into one object to use this class. One good approach to passing multiple fixture objects is to encapsulate them in a case class. Here's an example:
case class FixtureParam(file: File, writer: FileWriter)
To enable the stacking of traits that define withFixture(NoArgTest), it is a good idea to let
withFixture(NoArgTest) invoke the test function instead of invoking the test
function directly. To do so, you'll need to convert the OneArgTest to a NoArgTest. You can do that by passing
the fixture object to the toNoArgTest method of OneArgTest. In other words, instead of
writing “test(theFixture)”, you'd delegate responsibility for
invoking the test function to the withFixture(NoArgTest) method of the same instance by writing:
withFixture(test.toNoArgTest(theFixture))
Here's a complete example:
package org.scalatest.examples.featurespec.oneargtest
import org.scalatest.featurespec
import java.io._
class ExampleSpec extends featurespec.FixtureAnyFeatureSpec {
case class FixtureParam(file: File, writer: FileWriter)
def withFixture(test: OneArgTest) = {
// create the fixture
val file = File.createTempFile("hello", "world")
val writer = new FileWriter(file)
val theFixture = FixtureParam(file, writer)
try {
writer.write("ScalaTest is designed to be ") // set up the fixture
withFixture(test.toNoArgTest(theFixture)) // "loan" the fixture to the test
}
finally writer.close() // clean up the fixture
}
Feature("Simplicity") {
Scenario("User needs to read test code written by others") { f =>
f.writer.write("encourage clear code!")
f.writer.flush()
assert(f.file.length === 49)
}
Scenario("User needs to understand what the tests are doing") { f =>
f.writer.write("be easy to reason about!")
f.writer.flush()
assert(f.file.length === 52)
}
}
}
If a test fails, the OneArgTest function will result in a Failed wrapping the exception describing the failure.
To ensure clean up happens even if a test fails, you should invoke the test function from inside a try block and do the cleanup in a
finally clause, as shown in the previous example.
== Sharing fixtures across classes ==
If multiple test classes need the same fixture, you can define the FixtureParam and withFixture(OneArgTest) implementations
in a trait, then mix that trait into the test classes that need it. For example, if your application requires a database and your integration tests
use that database, you will likely have many test classes that need a database fixture. You can create a "database fixture" trait that creates a
database with a unique name, passes the connector into the test, then removes the database once the test completes. This is shown in the following example:
package org.scalatest.examples.fixture.featurespec.sharing
import java.util.concurrent.ConcurrentHashMap
import org.scalatest.featurespec
import DbServer._
import java.util.UUID.randomUUID
object DbServer { // Simulating a database server
type Db = StringBuffer
private val databases = new ConcurrentHashMap[String, Db]
def createDb(name: String): Db = {
val db = new StringBuffer
databases.put(name, db)
db
}
def removeDb(name: String) {
databases.remove(name)
}
}
trait DbFixture { this: FixtureSuite =>
type FixtureParam = Db
// Allow clients to populate the database after
// it is created
def populateDb(db: Db) {}
def withFixture(test: OneArgTest) {
val dbName = randomUUID.toString
val db = createDb(dbName) // create the fixture
try {
populateDb(db) // setup the fixture
withFixture(test.toNoArgTest(db)) // "loan" the fixture to the test
}
finally removeDb(dbName) // clean up the fixture
}
}
class ExampleSpec extends featurespec.FixtureAnyFeatureSpec with DbFixture {
override def populateDb(db: Db) { // setup the fixture
db.append("ScalaTest is designed to ")
}
Feature("Simplicity") {
Scenario("User needs to read test code written by others") { db =>
db.append("encourage clear code!")
assert(db.toString === "ScalaTest is designed to encourage clear code!")
}
Scenario("User needs to understand what the tests are doing") { db =>
db.append("be easy to reason about!")
assert(db.toString === "ScalaTest is designed to be easy to reason about!")
}
Scenario("User needs to write tests") { () =>
val buf = new StringBuffer
buf.append("ScalaTest is designed to be ")
buf.append("easy to learn!")
assert(buf.toString === "ScalaTest is designed to be easy to learn!")
}
}
}
Often when you create fixtures in a trait like DbFixture, you'll still need to enable individual test classes
to "setup" a newly created fixture before it gets passed into the tests. A good way to accomplish this is to pass the newly
created fixture into a setup method, like populateDb in the previous example, before passing it to the test
function. Classes that need to perform such setup can override the method, as does ExampleSpec.
If a test doesn't need the fixture, you can indicate that by providing a no-arg instead of a one-arg function, as is done in the
third test in the previous example, “Test code should be clear”. In other words, instead of starting your function literal
with something like “db =>”, you'd start it with “() =>”. For such tests, runTest
will not invoke withFixture(OneArgTest). It will instead directly invoke withFixture(NoArgTest).
Both examples shown above demonstrate the technique of giving each test its own "fixture sandbox" to play in. When your fixtures
involve external side-effects, like creating files or databases, it is a good idea to give each file or database a unique name as is
done in these examples. This keeps tests completely isolated, allowing you to run them in parallel if desired. You could mix
ParallelTestExecution into either of these ExampleSpec classes, and the tests would run in parallel just fine.
Implementation trait for class FixtureAnyFeatureSpec, which is
a sister class to org.scalatest.featurespec.AnyFeatureSpec that can pass a
fixture object into its tests.
Implementation trait for class FixtureAnyFeatureSpec, which is
a sister class to org.scalatest.featurespec.AnyFeatureSpec that can pass a
fixture object into its tests.
FixtureAnyFeatureSpec is a class,
not a trait, to minimize compile time given there is a slight compiler
overhead to mixing in traits compared to extending classes. If you need
to mix the behavior of FixtureAnyFeatureSpec into some other
class, you can use this trait instead, because class
FixtureAnyFeatureSpec does nothing more than extend this trait and add a nice toString implementation.
See the documentation of the class for a detailed
overview of FixtureAnyFeatureSpec.
A sister class to org.scalatest.featurespec.AsyncFeatureSpec that can pass a fixture object into its tests.
A sister class to org.scalatest.featurespec.AsyncFeatureSpec that can pass a fixture object into its tests.
Recommended Usage:
Use class FixtureAsyncFeatureSpec in situations for which AsyncFeatureSpec
would be a good choice, when all or most tests need the same fixture objects
that must be cleaned up afterwards. Note: FixtureAsyncFeatureSpec is intended for use in special situations, with class AsyncFeatureSpec used for general needs. For
more insight into where FixtureAsyncFeatureSpec fits in the big picture, see the withFixture(OneArgAsyncTest) subsection of the Shared fixtures section in the documentation for class AsyncFeatureSpec.
|
Class FixtureAsyncFeatureSpec behaves similarly to class org.scalatest.featurespec.AsyncFeatureSpec, except that tests may have a
fixture parameter. The type of the
fixture parameter is defined by the abstract FixtureParam type, which is a member of this class.
This class also contains an abstract withFixture method. This withFixture method
takes a OneArgAsyncTest, which is a nested trait defined as a member of this class.
OneArgAsyncTest has an apply method that takes a FixtureParam.
This apply method is responsible for running a test.
This class's runTest method delegates the actual running of each test to withFixture(OneArgAsyncTest), passing
in the test code to run via the OneArgAsyncTest argument. The withFixture(OneArgAsyncTest) method (abstract in this class) is responsible
for creating the fixture argument and passing it to the test function.
Subclasses of this class must, therefore, do three things differently from a plain old org.scalatest.featurespec.AsyncFeatureSpec:
-
define the type of the fixture parameter by specifying type
FixtureParam -
define the
withFixture(OneArgAsyncTest)method -
write tests that take a fixture parameter
-
(You can also define tests that don't take a fixture parameter.)
If the fixture you want to pass into your tests consists of multiple objects, you will need to combine them into one object to use this class. One good approach to passing multiple fixture objects is to encapsulate them in a case class. Here's an example:
case class FixtureParam(file: File, writer: FileWriter)
To enable the stacking of traits that define withFixture(NoArgAsyncTest), it is a good idea to let
withFixture(NoArgAsyncTest) invoke the test function instead of invoking the test
function directly. To do so, you'll need to convert the OneArgAsyncTest to a NoArgAsyncTest. You can do that by passing
the fixture object to the toNoArgAsyncTest method of OneArgAsyncTest. In other words, instead of
writing “test(theFixture)”, you'd delegate responsibility for
invoking the test function to the withFixture(NoArgAsyncTest) method of the same instance by writing:
withFixture(test.toNoArgAsyncTest(theFixture))
Here's a complete example:
package org.scalatest.examples.asyncfeaturespec.oneargasynctest
import org.scalatest._
import scala.concurrent.Future
import scala.concurrent.ExecutionContext
// Defining actor messages
sealed abstract class StringOp
case object Clear extends StringOp
case class Append(value: String) extends StringOp
case object GetValue
class StringActor { // Simulating an actor
private final val sb = new StringBuilder
def !(op: StringOp): Unit =
synchronized {
op match {
case Append(value) => sb.append(value)
case Clear => sb.clear()
}
}
def ?(get: GetValue.type)(implicit c: ExecutionContext): Future[String] =
Future {
synchronized { sb.toString }
}
}
class ExampleSpec extends featurespec.FixtureAsyncFeatureSpec {
type FixtureParam = StringActor
def withFixture(test: OneArgAsyncTest): FutureOutcome = {
val actor = new StringActor
complete {
actor ! Append("ScalaTest is designed to ") // set up the fixture
withFixture(test.toNoArgAsyncTest(actor))
} lastly {
actor ! Clear // ensure the fixture will be cleaned up
}
}
Feature("Simplicity") {
Scenario("User needs to read test code written by others") { actor =>
actor ! Append("encourage clear code!")
val futureString = actor ? GetValue
futureString map { s =>
assert(s === "ScalaTest is designed to encourage clear code!")
}
}
Scenario("User needs to understand what the tests are doing") { actor =>
actor ! Append("be easy to reason about!")
val futureString = actor ? GetValue
futureString map { s =>
assert(s === "ScalaTest is designed to be easy to reason about!")
}
}
}
}
If a test fails, the future returned by the OneArgAsyncTest function will result in
an org.scalatest.Failed wrapping the exception describing
the failure. To ensure clean up happens even if a test fails, you should invoke the test function and do the cleanup using
complete-lastly, as shown in the previous example. The complete-lastly syntax, defined in CompleteLastly, which is extended by AsyncTestSuite, ensures
the second, cleanup block of code is executed, whether the the first block throws an exception or returns a future. If it returns a
future, the cleanup will be executed when the future completes.
== Sharing fixtures across classes ==
If multiple test classes need the same fixture, you can define the FixtureParam and withFixture(OneArgAsyncTest)
implementations in a trait, then mix that trait into the test classes that need it. For example, if your application requires a database and your
integration tests use that database, you will likely have many test classes that need a database fixture. You can create a "database fixture" trait
that creates a database with a unique name, passes the connector into the test, then removes the database once the test completes. This is shown in
the following example:
* package org.scalatest.examples.fixture.asyncfeaturespec.sharing
import java.util.concurrent.ConcurrentHashMap
import org.scalatest._
import DbServer._
import java.util.UUID.randomUUID
import scala.concurrent.Future
object DbServer { // Simulating a database server
type Db = StringBuffer
private val databases = new ConcurrentHashMap[String, Db]
def createDb(name: String): Db = {
val db = new StringBuffer
databases.put(name, db)
db
}
def removeDb(name: String) {
databases.remove(name)
}
}
trait DbFixture { this: FixtureAsyncTestSuite =>
type FixtureParam = Db
// Allow clients to populate the database after
// it is created
def populateDb(db: Db) {}
def withFixture(test: OneArgAsyncTest): FutureOutcome = {
val dbName = randomUUID.toString
val db = createDb(dbName) // create the fixture
complete {
populateDb(db) // setup the fixture
withFixture(test.toNoArgAsyncTest(db)) // "loan" the fixture to the test
} lastly {
removeDb(dbName) // ensure the fixture will be cleaned up
}
}
}
class ExampleSpec extends featurespec.FixtureAsyncFeatureSpec with DbFixture {
override def populateDb(db: Db) { // setup the fixture
db.append("ScalaTest is ")
}
Feature("Simplicity") {
Scenario("Testing should be easy to write") { db =>
Future {
db.append("easy to write!")
assert(db.toString === "ScalaTest is easy to write!")
}
}
Scenario("Testing should be fun") { db =>
Future {
db.append("fun to write!")
assert(db.toString === "ScalaTest is fun to write!")
}
}
// This test doesn't need a Db
Scenario("Testing code should be clear") { () =>
Future {
val buf = new StringBuffer
buf.append("ScalaTest code is ")
buf.append("clear!")
assert(buf.toString === "ScalaTest code is clear!")
}
}
}
}
Often when you create fixtures in a trait like DbFixture, you'll still need to enable individual test classes
to "setup" a newly created fixture before it gets passed into the tests. A good way to accomplish this is to pass the newly
created fixture into a setup method, like populateDb in the previous example, before passing it to the test
function. Classes that need to perform such setup can override the method, as does ExampleSuite.
If a test doesn't need the fixture, you can indicate that by providing a no-arg instead of a one-arg function, as is done in the
third test in the previous example, “test code should be clear”. In other words, instead of starting your function literal
with something like “db =>”, you'd start it with “() =>”. For such tests, runTest
will not invoke withFixture(OneArgAsyncTest). It will instead directly invoke withFixture(NoArgAsyncTest).
Both examples shown above demonstrate the technique of giving each test its own "fixture sandbox" to play in. When your fixtures
involve external side-effects, like creating files or databases, it is a good idea to give each file or database a unique name as is
done in these examples. This keeps tests completely isolated, allowing you to run them in parallel if desired. You could mix
ParallelTestExecution into either of these ExampleSuite classes, and the tests would run in parallel just fine.
Implementation trait for class FixtureAsyncFeatureSpec, which is
a sister class to org.scalatest.featurespec.AsyncFeatureSpec that can pass a
fixture object into its tests.
Implementation trait for class FixtureAsyncFeatureSpec, which is
a sister class to org.scalatest.featurespec.AsyncFeatureSpec that can pass a
fixture object into its tests.
FixtureAsyncFeatureSpec is a class,
not a trait, to minimize compile time given there is a slight compiler
overhead to mixing in traits compared to extending classes. If you need
to mix the behavior of FixtureAsyncFeatureSpec into some other
class, you can use this trait instead, because class
FixtureAsyncFeatureSpec does nothing more than extend this trait and add a nice toString implementation.
See the documentation of the class for a detailed
overview of FixtureAsyncFeatureSpec.